IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-va-06

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Wed, 25 April 2012 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D442621F8638 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.541
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.541 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60iqywv4oapq for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og117.obsmtp.com (exprod7og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F210221F8613 for <grow@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT5iM2B1ZUcYx0EjtIgBKoZhq6zzy8uox@postini.com; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:46:34 PDT
Received: from P-CLDFE01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:45:06 -0700
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by p-cldfe01-hq.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:45:06 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:45:05 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:45:04 -0400
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-grow-va-06
Thread-Index: Ac0dqdCJqg2iUU35TT+pAy0eB8n2YwFkd8VQ
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D76AB92C4C@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-va-06
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:46:34 -0000

Folks,

One week ago, I polled the WG in an attempt to gage interest in draft-ietf-grow-va. The following responses were posted:

- http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02231.html
- http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02233.html
- http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02235.html
- http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/current/msg02236.html

I also received one private message referring to an IPR issues surrounding the draft.

Of these five messages, two were opposed to publication of the draft, one asked a question, and only two could be interpreted as possibly supporting its publication. This exchange cannot be interpreted as strong WG support for publication of the draft.

Therefore, I will transition this draft, and it helper, draft-ietf-grow-va-auto to the AD-WATCHING state. If anyone feels that there is strong WG interest in publishing this draft, they may ask the WG chairs to conduct another WG last call o demonstrate interest.

                                             Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Bonica
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 5:26 PM
> To: grow@ietf.org
> Subject: draft-ietf-grow-va-06
> 
> Folks,
> 
> The WG has recently submitted draft-ietf-grow-va-06 for publication. As
> part of my AD review, I looked for discussion of this draft on the
> mailing list archive. Excluding messages from internet-drafts@ietf.org
> and the chairs, I see no messages posted over the last 12 months. The
> only messages that I see posted during the previous 12 months are:
> 
> - (Mar-17-2011) http://www.ietf.org/mail-
> archive/web/grow/current/msg01850.html
> - (Sep-20-2010) http://www.ietf.org/mail-
> archive/web/grow/current/msg01748.html
> - (Aug-23-2010) http://www.ietf.org/mail-
> archive/web/grow/current/msg01726.html
> - (Jun-23-2010 - Jun-26-2010) IPR Disclosure: Huawei Technologies Co.,
> Ltd's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-grow-va-02 and 14
> responses
> 
> Given this, I need to gage the degree to which the WG is still
> interested in the draft.
> 
> Can anyone speak to the level of WG interest in this draft? As this is
> an operational WG, I am especially interested in hearing from
> operators. However, all views are welcomed.
> 
> --------------------------
> Ron Bonica
> vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email