Re: [GROW] Call for WG Adoption - draft-manderson-grow-geomrt-00
Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Thu, 29 July 2010 16:30 UTC
Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: grow@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC3F28C166 for <grow@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.936
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.936 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.663, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bw8Hi5cyBGui for <grow@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org (expfe100-1.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.236]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D273A68DA for <grow@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:30:43 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:30:40 -0700
Thread-Topic: [GROW] Call for WG Adoption - draft-manderson-grow-geomrt-00
Thread-Index: AcsvLy4akR79cd9ORkezjbZCPQo0kwADDOr7
Message-ID: <C877E9D0.61AF%terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100729150255.GE19401@slice>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Call for WG Adoption - draft-manderson-grow-geomrt-00
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:30:27 -0000
Hi Jeff, On 30/07/10 1:02 AM, "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote: > Administrative comment: > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:00:55AM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote: >> The meeting today had a call for WG Adoption of the subject document. >> Given 14 days of debate time means we decide Aug 12 2010. > > If they are only interested in a FCFS code point, then having the document > as a WG document isn't necessary. This is the main distinction with the > other document required code points. Thanks for the comment, I am confused about this however. The draft isn't only about acquiring a code-point. It is about providing knowledge back to the networking community covering, what I think, a useful mechanism to match BGP updates to a geographic location that endures historical inspection. Even if the code point is FCFS (which means I can reset the document status to informational) I still think it could be of value, and I think it might benefit from WG review. However I will acquiesce to the WG decision. Or have I misinterpreted your point? Cheers Terry
- [GROW] Call for WG Adoption - draft-manderson-gro… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [GROW] Call for WG Adoption - draft-manderson… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [GROW] Call for WG Adoption - draft-manderson… Terry Manderson
- Re: [GROW] Call for WG Adoption - draft-manderson… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [GROW] Call for WG Adoption - draft-manderson… Joe Abley