Re: [GROW] Call for GROW WG adoption of grow-overlapping-routes

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:59 PM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Peter Schoenmaker <pds@lugs.com> wrote:
>> At IETF in vancouver we had a presentation from Russ White for a new working
>> group item draft-white-grow-overlapping-routes-00.  I would like to gauge
>> the working group interest in adopting this draft as a working group item.
>> Can people please voice their approval or disapproval.
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> What am I missing? The last few times this was discussed here or on

you're probably not missing anything in particular, except that you
didn't state whether or not the doc (or the ideas that the doc
contains/explains) should show up as a working-group work item.

> RRG, RIB aggregation fell apart on the details. For example, what
> happens when:
>
> AS1 announces 10.1.0.0/16 from network A via ISP 1 and 2
> AS1 announces 10.1.33.0/24 from network B via ISP 3 and 4
>
> If the answer is: AS1 disaggregates 10.1.0.0/16 in order to avoid
> overlapping 10.2.33.0/24 because at least a couple folks implementing
> overlapping-routes broke network B then what is there to discuss?
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
> --
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com  bill@herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow