IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] new working group items

Peter Schoenmaker <pds@lugs.com> Tue, 17 February 2009 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <pds@lugs.com>
X-Original-To: grow@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4033A6964 for <grow@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:26:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kCEvaU-vYcAz for <grow@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from murdock.lugs.com (ipv6.murdock.lugs.com [IPv6:2001:418:c01::4]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776343A67E7 for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from six.dgsi.com (six.dgsi.com [204.62.232.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by murdock.lugs.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1HIPooU045693; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:26:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pds@lugs.com)
Message-Id: <C89396CA-1CDA-4492-81E5-E20AE2C61811@lugs.com>
From: Peter Schoenmaker <pds@lugs.com>
To: LOWE Jim <Jim.Lowe@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <41B3B178A129B6458752EC1B4D14998C020065A0@USDALSMBS04.ad3.ad.alcatel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:26:39 -0800
References: <F33485AC-EE0C-4534-8D6E-C1CCB2389A75@lugs.com> <41B3B178A129B6458752EC1B4D14998C020065A0@USDALSMBS04.ad3.ad.alcatel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (murdock.lugs.com [192.80.15.4]); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:26:47 -0500 (EST)
Cc: grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] new working group items
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:26:40 -0000

Its been a long time, but the consensus appears to be to accept this  
as a working group draft.

peter


On Dec 19, 2008, at 6:58 AM, LOWE Jim wrote:

> Hi Peter,
>
> Since I'm a co-author of the document in question, this might be in  
> bad
> taste, but I would like to see the document go forward as a working
> group draft.
>
> Cheers,
> Jim.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: grow-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:grow-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf  
> Of
> Peter Schoenmaker
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 6:33 PM
> To: grow@ietf.org
> Subject: [GROW] new working group items
>
> hi,
>
> We would like to poll the group about a new working group item.
>
> o  at dublin dimitri papadimitriou presented on draft-dimitri-grow-
> rss-03.txt.  <http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dimitri-grow-rss-03.txt>
> I would like to ask if the working group thinks we should adopt this  
> as
> a working group draft?  The proposal is to make this an experimental
> RFC.
>
> Thanks
>
> peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email