[GROW] Re: Andy Newton's No Objection on draft-ietf-grow-nrtm-v4-09: (with COMMENT)
Sasha Romijn <sasha@reliablycoded.nl> Fri, 10 April 2026 13:03 UTC
Return-Path: <sasha@reliablycoded.nl>
X-Original-To: grow@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: grow@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA46D9738B8; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 06:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1775826201; bh=uzhmL9wpguTUsf4he/89m4Ei5ITOA4bH/QxWfI9egsw=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=TSQ+Q+Y4YZZxKu7z/5VuqQ2NzOH2rGqB7hSJW80f95ob1ucIubL+ZbMNMM7b/vDDY k/8YcwJbLbNhRqqrEBWSb8o4ssiNlIh2UkDIhae+VIU37ydc5ieZSW8TijfCiDfXhV HbzdWWg2900mun3I3ObmMJ5rNkNJlMi9MalfsVzA=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=reliablycoded.nl
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tw_gBBDBFw3A; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 06:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.s42.re (mx.s42.re [IPv6:2a14:b400::25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55FFD973540; Fri, 10 Apr 2026 06:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=reliablycoded.nl; s=2025022501; t=1775826107; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AjaXef2RRtOTT/U2woPEfFAZJ5J8COgXCYvyJPfU3FY=; b=NJLCENEsVNBbjag7/QIKrreX0Eogu0KqxSRkCqsWHZibMXv4RapV7J28Zx87T7khSndOw6 Lz+qHubGfoFDrQOTkVu6EELUjG4SOaGyrXcwIu0HZ+HG9lG4xwoX8MX2VUekq/9IpNQpvM /9EsVBAAyd6irHjnxBFDmfcvqKsHiobaVC08clxa5JshvLE1tr5bTIw0ZJbizlR0/1YMxG NmUTEFLVzYTaYYlbvMwNhigveDmA16HiRzu0EnPY+MrB0lWRdx/kl86sb/gqhvZ5jKkQVj 47LlOtjsUMw8Z8r+b5PjckylJA4y6xBuPkbflcs8AP2P+5RznXH6us14LO+vzw==
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.500.181\))
From: Sasha Romijn <sasha@reliablycoded.nl>
In-Reply-To: <7df2aa45-63c8-4e02-bc19-f2934c249cc3@hxr.us>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 15:01:37 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <73C1828F-7AE1-4692-A3B7-4E8813FA7A8D@reliablycoded.nl>
References: <177577575604.707.5002143833129803545@dt-datatracker-647897bf7-7f2k5> <91CA5BCA-3790-45E3-94E3-07C9DCCE633A@reliablycoded.nl> <7df2aa45-63c8-4e02-bc19-f2934c249cc3@hxr.us>
To: Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Message-ID-Hash: TVSMCFLVETONYFVA7OVBK2XICBQAU5Z3
X-Message-ID-Hash: TVSMCFLVETONYFVA7OVBK2XICBQAU5Z3
X-MailFrom: sasha@reliablycoded.nl
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-grow.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-grow-nrtm-v4@ietf.org, grow-chairs@ietf.org, grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [GROW] Re: Andy Newton's No Objection on draft-ietf-grow-nrtm-v4-09: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/G2q4fT1FUntRgQST0CXnVygUpaw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:grow-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:grow-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:grow-leave@ietf.org>
Hello Andy, On 10 Apr 2026, at 12:46, Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us> wrote: >>> 982 It is RECOMMENDED that IRR Database operators rotate the signing key >>> 983 on their mirror server about once per year. .... >>> >>> The "about" leaves a lot of room for interpretation. Can a range be specified, >>> such as between 8 months and 16 months? >> >> We can, but I do not feel that is a real improvement. The range is intentionally vague, the intended boundaries are: not so often that it becomes annoying; not so rarely that it becomes an unfamiliar procedure. > > Would it make sense that this be a non-normative "recommended"? It seems that once the community has operational experience this advice would change anyway. > Or maybe change the advice to what you have stated above. > > "It is recommended that the IRR Database operators rotate the signing key on their mirror > server with a frequency that is not disruptive to operations but preserves the familiarity of > the practices to accomplish key rotation. Many organizations have settled on annual cycles." I see your point, making it non-normative and explained like you suggest, serves the purpose better. We will adopt that suggestion. >>> Has the working group considered using media types to describe the type of >>> content in the files, instead of relying on file name suffixes? That might >>> offer some flexibility for switching to different compression types, etc..., in >>> the future. >> >> This has not come up before. It's a valid point, but we feel this change would be too impactful at this time. > > Understood. My thought was that with just a little more generalization, NRTMv4 could be easily adapted to RDAP mirroring, etc... > something I know some people have mused about. Maybe for NRTMv5… That would be interesting. I do imagine RDAP mirroring might have other requirements that aren't well accommodated now. More something for the future. Sasha
- [GROW] Andy Newton's No Objection on draft-ietf-g… Andy Newton via Datatracker
- [GROW] Re: Andy Newton's No Objection on draft-ie… Sasha Romijn
- [GROW] Re: Andy Newton's No Objection on draft-ie… Andy Newton
- [GROW] Re: Andy Newton's No Objection on draft-ie… Sasha Romijn