Re: [GROW] Request WG Adoption for draft-sa-grow-maxprefix

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Wed, 31 July 2019 01:30 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B11F1200C4 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wRY8CjYW1kgC for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04D60120026 for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id w24so29667113plp.2 for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YMpa0XDoZrNQ0PKiZGjLMkHCNxkujcayFum8ktjFj3g=; b=WquVvLcwMxZVpE9l4a9rdeevG6h6l0ADJeReIurOBGbJ4v1tJwxT6bBrEdWacnQY4Q Ijyt+m78PEBtp/1E8DCsaN+HdSpRk07Y350LKgoulP3p9PvjR61DI5KgHuoIprNdpn5V D7R9Be/WCfJDNWtaBqT7dsnscx6dvSOCwoMzbxoMrgifUo66mQnZ4J6WB9G1ZNqdICxZ NiyW4Mqyx0d04FPM/57YMdPvfofVtwIjHNli7FeE7IUitTwO8xvMDZdz3JlwdWr8A+S2 I9t6dogXdInTxxl9DSLh5uRtazaznT0dsY+qivrIBYjmCOqQd62vbOJP5Cy9zG+aqk7b kOEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=YMpa0XDoZrNQ0PKiZGjLMkHCNxkujcayFum8ktjFj3g=; b=gdGMe+VoriJLrWp7uRRu/nS0NQ4VIEs0k3VA2MpOHjferNPTZ0XxzRsqMHLiUWc9Tv GqFpGaNfiwmFaGTieJcIFLDrwC/3LUNxu3OhlNHE3DuWxqrdfTldI4MB3Q4LqNQavxSd uGT4YZnx2uLgYSbRt910TyTuaa9rz+4Zc+OcqyuxFRDj11ZZ3QCBLlVYw7LrZ+To9NNn qiwISF0GSiLPcFrJEEKxTgP9yEumzLQ2BVUiK7mrJ7G+KfO7FD+dFzdZXG6pmzd3afDk r+NWtibZtpsJ6IbGEHffn0edSCUJ22HLMypWGEEI8lXPMwLqyy3gwYD3/EsIS2n/5Q75 HbEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX0G1FnDe1aKfrmju/t10RyMZMBUdN51Ta1kgVLB+2Yp35eNbSN W3yKKK5peGhyFiCN4xcA/VA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzLNeLNUoMgWHsW7O/pHWb9pfR5M+KiTBsR12f8kLWHDAlei71HlauPmnDB3EnLN7X9pH8u7A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa8a:: with SMTP id d10mr120361552plr.154.1564536643174; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vurt.meerval.net (h175-177-005-135.catv02.itscom.jp. [175.177.5.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t96sm101090pjb.1.2019.07.30.18.30.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vurt.meerval.net [local]) by vurt.meerval.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 63880a6a; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 01:30:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 01:30:28 +0000
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
Cc: Melchior Aelmans <melchior@aelmans.eu>, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190731013028.GF15098@vurt.meerval.net>
References: <E4128E49-2CA1-4B2A-AB62-B60D4A3C4DF0@aelmans.eu> <DM6PR11MB3755B8C09D606E9B4934E9C6C0DF0@DM6PR11MB3755.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB3755B8C09D606E9B4934E9C6C0DF0@DM6PR11MB3755.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/Gyv2W3AKFadOGqpL6doS2khugMs>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Request WG Adoption for draft-sa-grow-maxprefix
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 01:30:46 -0000

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 01:21:04AM +0000, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
> In response to Robert's point on the IDR list related to
> draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-persistence: If BGP session terminates
> unexpectedly - say when max prefix is reached - it is quite unclear on
> the operational consequences of such duet of features enabled
> together.
> 
> may I suggest that response to the outbound maximum prefix exceeded
> event should be a hard CEASE as defined in
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8538. It already suggests to use a hard
> CEASE for an inbound maximum prefix exceeded event.
> 
> Robert, will that satisfy your concern with persistence?

While the question is addressed to Robert, I think this is a good idea
and am happy to incorporate text in the maxprefix Internet-Draft that
references the rfc8538 hard reset concept.

Kind regards,

Job