IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-11 Peer Flags IANA Conflict Resolution

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 15 June 2021 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152333A3614 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GlLIWEJYthoO for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 107DB3A360B for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id x14so25917707ljp.7 for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Wpv7zjJRr4gi0FPOuBISzwq+FLniJdBS1GnTDm5K02Y=; b=MLIwbDF8ZByrj+YiLy1S9JsNmz4D4ip9PZzhK6NxgVJEd8ghIm1jO1AGjYjz5XjMRe r1rTfo9qdoAOB5247INsNtOO+i5PVuqPAfJlGwJGMZUueYhXW4v0RCMCieW/JIml131N m4rQXaV7mqbGiOyPSJQ3UJbE7W0UDvBHJwFMLlhYWGK0+WmSmWg2Wy/UKfdumxqAIlb0 t7w5wG12He6syHJgNU82ICWTkvvrc63oL6hN8hp1j9X4C6RkPD91ZUA+BwsdhS9DfRNY 12iU3v/s4r9MK5zAA508sPwhg69GfWEmaae/nTvOLkLDRL9/LnEEK/VLTdMgptnYZnVJ im7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wpv7zjJRr4gi0FPOuBISzwq+FLniJdBS1GnTDm5K02Y=; b=Mz6d0+xiZ/nRJx6k7MsnvKN3nODgWP5+Nwqfwha3ZHIRRmYWMCaLRrA4xsOA+skMZV FLJoO4X1fXvfjQDlLrwJRCTf+lUBoxTXEcdSlXUth6rAUXXn+pDBbgi6gw38I4qLEFwS 8hLB+1AZVVcaKMXzJ1UzWJMZjRVIhpggBR7gVulvIWVvTQTwIfiXEBX75yP6YGSmvbjR oxrPcJEd612GxLSgmL0VASKnS/8JzKvb4DMAHJuAl/yXC2JHyeY08XE4fp2BBK+6NXq6 MyBe35UQ0jkNm8Jo/+nSpVD+jA5ULgafruAWzRjBNg+9dRUCfpUq0eQSBzfqvS55eGet pP1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NIXAE/NLqf6Vb72A2N1f0JOwdgz5ogSBCbniRdmRLedUbPnOE UkfZhaizuxopI8ONW+4X4C0foO7a/UM7e/naI6jwapNZktI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRaAdF585PPf8L1UcEX6ZDieRhWMyEHOxX9P1HDXTApIbLCZ6ElGvRTW7DF1nMzBo47imLsmLC3zXRWSVRJjE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9201:: with SMTP id k1mr428683ljg.309.1623775331883; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MW3PR11MB4651BC7FA1A9D1858183B1FEB65E9@MW3PR11MB4651.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MW3PR11MB4651BC7FA1A9D1858183B1FEB65E9@MW3PR11MB4651.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:41:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+5OMkzGP8WZAHUotuaTiyZwJmuP_k0AToYc4M_Hxp7dQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tim Evens (tievens)" <tievens=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib@ietf.org>, "grow-chairs@ietf.org" <grow-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da2ecd05c4d0a7dc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/LEsWf_Ro0NA_EYBy7cqpOJffEBg>
Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-11 Peer Flags IANA Conflict Resolution
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:42:23 -0000

[ + John Scudder ]
Just a quick note.

The latest version (-12) of the document was just published; the diff is
here:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-11&url2=draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-12

I'm planning on releasing it by Friday unless I hear any strong
objections...

W

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 6:00 PM Tim Evens (tievens) <tievens=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> There is a conflict between the IANA registry
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/bmp-parameters/bmp-parameters.xhtml#peer-flags
> and
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-10#section-4.2.
> Originally, we defined that flag 0 would indicate the F flag but IANA put
> this as flag 4 under the existing peer flags registry.
>
>
>
> Does anyone know if any implementation exists today expecting flag 0? If
> so, is it a significant problem if we changed it to flag 4 to be consistent
> with IANA draft assignment?  We are still requesting a new registry "BMP
> Peer Flags for Loc-RIB Instance Peer Type 3."   This registry will start
> off with flag 4 being assigned as the F flag.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-11#section-8.2
> describes this request.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>


-- 
The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the
complexities of his own making.
  -- E. W. Dijkstra

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email