Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Thu, 22 September 2022 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC05C1524A6 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GIYG50p_oKru for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10816C1522D5 for <grow@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40F151E037; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:00:50 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMG8+4v6NbW+iEvL9Xit+_bDi4PHzWf_S70aXCvj_8wSMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:00:49 -0400
Cc: Paolo Lucente <paolo@ntt.net>, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, Maximilian Wilhelm <max@rfc2324.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <287FB3CB-0769-4B54-9F7A-D4FAE2CC4681@pfrc.org>
References: <bd7c5fb4-b398-c979-6f6b-0de82fd2ee12@bernat.ch> <dba40193-138e-5981-a4c2-6fc44fadde51@bernat.ch> <20220912203612.GA18968@pfrc.org> <6CB8C0EB-DC6E-48A8-993A-C98DEBD0D04A@juniper.net> <463DBA4E-3136-4A0F-A298-D081FEB123EB@pfrc.org> <20220914230819.GD27304@principal.rfc2324.org> <20220916101510.GA1365691@corley.shackle.nl> <MW3PR11MB4651FA81C4FC0E6C0F488DB4B64D9@MW3PR11MB4651.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMFtgEDOpXLREEsv8ovpeFXzQOtGv9EO88y5cB2eTo+UdA@mail.gmail.com> <MW3PR11MB46513C54B1D47195ECCBDBF2B64D9@MW3PR11MB4651.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MME6W8RriOD6o_Cxktx1QnhFVx1ckSgm3VnFhV15FvNPrw@mail.gmail.com> <bea671a4-fc4b-f213-82c0-1ed160be2798@ntt.net> <CAOj+MMG8+4v6NbW+iEvL9Xit+_bDi4PHzWf_S70aXCvj_8wSMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/YdZPwDKxu0TgW7s8mTBeZoXWiLo>
Subject: Re: [GROW] [Idr] RFC7854: EoR
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 18:00:54 -0000


> On Sep 21, 2022, at 1:52 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Paolo,
>  
> A-la: there is multiple updates related to a certain NLRI by when a BMP 
> message is to be sent out, let's state-compress (ie. not send out) those 
> that were already obsoleted by a subsequent update.
> 
> But this will hide BGP churn for a given NET to be detectable by BMP receiver. Is this a good thing ? I am not sure. It is a loss of information to me. 

State compression for route-monitoring messages in BMP is common.

If you wanted perfect state, you would use route-mirroring mode, if the implementation supported it.

-- Jeff