IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] Note about current IDR WGLC: draft-ietf-idr-enhanced-refresh-impl

Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com> Thu, 16 January 2014 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D857A1AE3B6 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bFDHc0rPzZs6 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307EE1AE3B5 for <grow@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id w6so2081138lbh.6 for <grow@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eQYDiuO0qCfd8HKZ6hofivLc0Ozl0G9wBgoxfNZ1uxM=; b=NV7hg+dYxcw69YkwKVlawciqNuG64YTKv2P49Rra8GNOkOv7XBjrLXuR2g3Sa9W1P+ Ugbo4MeWmdoHLGdlvUxO5G6Sw/A4uio3BQRr26bC2Nt74U+kf5TI39AMWbTYImmVGrdj JDZCDBT9giZDqMd1U3dH5jz45k/9HxGiXHB06x7u+yQjbDag82EGl3c2egIAplIcZwM8 mfGIGCGcH5zxEiG2tgAlCFTeXK/4nc2epFb5rAycs9z57SkoZ9kFPTxioCon8IM1u/Qf Ytbymxa+EKTWvkK5F+QWEH4mKjv+5nOkTJtTAM3OsObe5WKCPWN/ABRKiji8eukb82aR wDTw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.148.104 with SMTP id tr8mr5359752lbb.42.1389890065037; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.37.170 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:34:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaa_59qkUe8pTGaszLGrK+6bPiUcYsPx+a8piz32ujF8xA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL9jLaa_59qkUe8pTGaszLGrK+6bPiUcYsPx+a8piz32ujF8xA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:34:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaa7oi_jf2J2nB=g4+hwiaRyo5TbnFbRozkgQr++bim=kQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
To: "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [GROW] Note about current IDR WGLC: draft-ietf-idr-enhanced-refresh-impl
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:34:40 -0000

oops, and the IDR folk also reminded me that:

this is the doc that describes the actual change, not the survey of
how well it did/didn't work out :) and is what is ACTUALLY in WGLC...

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh/

              Enhanced Route Refresh Capability for BGP-4
            draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh-05.txt

Abstract

   In this document we enhance the existing BGP route refresh mechanisms
   to provide for the demarcation of the beginning and the ending of a
   route refresh.  The enhancement can be used to facilitate correction
   of BGP RIB inconsistencies in a non-disruptive manner.

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Christopher Morrow
<christopher.morrow@gmail.com> wrote:
> Grow folks,
> IDR is running a WGLC for a document which some folk here might also
> find interesting/relevant:
>   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-enhanced-refresh-impl/>
>
> Please have a read and toss comments/questions/tomatoes/flowers at the
> IDR list as appropriate.
>
> The abstract for this doc is:
> Abstract
>
>    This document provides an implementation report for Enhanced Route
>    refresh as defined in draft-ietf-idr-bgp-enhanced-route-refresh.  The
>    editor did not verify the accuracy of the information provided by
>    respondents or by any alternative means.  The respondents are experts
>    with the implementations they reported on, and their responses are
>    considered authoritative for the implementations for which their
>    responses represent.
>
> thanks!
>
> -chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email