Re: [GROW] [Idr] Potential route flap with bgp-diverse-path

 > In the previous email, you said the exact opposite:
 > "Yes it would advertise overall best if backup is missing."

That is true but this is not applicable to the case here.

Here RRs as you have indicated would have P1, P2 and P3 and when P1 goes 
down there is backup on both RRs.

Thx,
R.

>>> If every RR plane must send a path, then the clients
>>> will have N paths for every destination, even if there
>>> is only one path.
>>
>> Nope that is not a requirement as discussed in the previous email.
>
> In the previous email, you said the exact opposite:
> "Yes it would advertise overall best if backup is missing."
>
> You require that to stop the flap.
>
>>
>>   >  Please make a recommendation on how many RR planes
>>   >  are optimal.
>>
>> For all applications of today I see 2 as sufficient and optimal.
>>
>> Thx,
>> R.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Given N RR planes,
>>> that means clients will need N times the BGP memory
>>> and N times the BGP processing power for destinations
>>> with only one path.
>>>
>>> Please make a recommendation on how many RR planes
>>> are optimal.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jakob Heitz.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>