[GROW] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-sriram-route-leak-detection-mitigation-00.txt

"Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Tue, 28 October 2014 16:16 UTC

From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: GROW WG <grow@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-sriram-route-leak-detection-mitigation-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHP8sjie+MIpcLEZEaCeJbYTPJ6Mg==
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 16:12:10 +0000
Message-ID: <1414512729759.3402@nist.gov>
References: <20141027222842.23964.59825.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>, <1414511737146.42356@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <1414511737146.42356@nist.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/hO25abEf8fxm9VpXXLKJpFKsZMI
Subject: [GROW] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-sriram-route-leak-detection-mitigation-00.txt
Precedence: list

Following up on my preceding email, this (notification below) is the second part
(after the 1 to 2 split) that documents the “route leaks solution proposal”.
This work was presented at the GROW meeting in Toronto, and it was suggested
that the path of progress for this document (solution proposal) should be through IDR to SIDR. 
I will be happy to present this work in the IDR or the joint IDR-SIDR meeting in Honolulu.
The earlier comments on this work at the GROW meeting in Toronto can be found here: 

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/minutes/minutes-90-grow 
  
Further comments, suggestions are welcome.

Sriram     

________________________________________
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 7:01 PM
To: Sriram, Kotikalapudi; Montgomery, Douglas; 
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-sriram-route-leak-detection-mitigation-00.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-sriram-route-leak-detection-mitigation-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Kotikalapudi Sriram and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-sriram-route-leak-detection-mitigation
Revision:       00
Title:          Methods for Detection and Mitigation of BGP Route Leaks
Document date:  2014-10-27
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          13
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sriram-route-leak-detection-mitigation-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sriram-route-leak-detection-mitigation/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sriram-route-leak-detection-mitigation-00


Abstract:
   In [I-D.ietf-sriram-route-leak-problem-definition], the authors have
   provided a definition of the route leak problem, and also enumerated
   several types of route leaks.  In this document, we first examine
   which of those route-leak types are detected and mitigated by the
   existing BGPSEC protocol [I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-09].  Where
   the current BGPSEC protocol doesn't offer a solution, this document
   suggests an enhancement that would extend the route-leak detection
   and mitigation capability of BGPSEC.  The solution can be implemented
   in BGP without necessarily tying it to BGPSEC.  Incorporating the
   solution in BGPSEC is one way of implementing it in a secure way.  We
   do not claim to have provided a solution for all possible types of
   route leaks, but the solution covers several, especially considering
   some significant route-leak attacks or occurrences that have been
   observed in recent years.  The document also includes a stopgap
   method for detection and mitigation of route leaks for the phase when
   BGPSEC (path validation) is not yet deployed but only origin
   validation is deployed.

[GROW] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-sri… Sriram, Kotikalapudi
[GROW] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-sri… Sriram, Kotikalapudi