IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] A question about RFC7854 stats report

"Tim Evens (tievens)" <tievens@cisco.com> Thu, 04 October 2018 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <tievens@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB46130E9A for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.957
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1-qvW--6mFUC for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A25129619 for <grow@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1232; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1538693310; x=1539902910; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=7eehCO3aQWuohZIn1dwjSUr0JhQwvdlX0ByHFZVhzFo=; b=DNS+yl9ZdVPEfNtxVkSeY9G4y7XEGjQHYaPcfXuqGmGaFmGjWAWlFz4d SNFfMLtAdhBYMGHOc01sZVvONWJFOEkRHKnaUJvtLKsToLWhv5PTcwmuy wLHy2tcF4JhQAbCslOz0mHYcRiasXXApmiHFpyfcJR9/RtV3H/O/PKxJc c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AGAAB0mLZb/4gNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBggWBZSgKg2qIFYwigg2WXYF6CwEBhGwCF4QOITQNDQEDAQECAQECbSiFOgEFIxFFEAIBCA4KAgImAgICMBUQAgQBDQWDIYICpQyBLooUgQuKIReBQT+BEicfgkyBJhuDPYMBMYImAoh5CIZUjgIJApA+F4FMjh+JBIw0AhEUgSUdOIFVcBU7KgGCQYIxjiNvjCyBHwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,341,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="180619908"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Oct 2018 22:48:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (xch-aln-019.cisco.com [173.36.7.29]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w94MmGnn017964 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 22:48:16 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) by XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (173.36.7.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:48:15 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com ([173.37.102.26]) by XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com ([173.37.102.26]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:48:15 -0500
From: "Tim Evens (tievens)" <tievens@cisco.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, Qing Yang <qyang@arista.com>
CC: "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [GROW] A question about RFC7854 stats report
Thread-Index: AQHUVPYfE98gYg4nxEGbHRPE6r3WXaUBqOUAgAADKYCAABotAIAAAoQAgAyZzICAABDngIAAHwUAgAE3hwCAAA0egP//xhyA
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 22:48:15 +0000
Message-ID: <4093774B-6BED-4CEE-B29F-91A2ACCBCB65@cisco.com>
References: <CANVvrcobAkBMqte2J=s_hzr++_THrX+0=nn1xzLBi2e+6UP=oQ@mail.gmail.com> <b3e705e7-3ef8-34e8-1875-ed620bb2f412@foobar.org> <CANVvrcpp1gLn_gwQ1CZPdPJjVkifCfXS0ZFQagAMjvpM3U4g+w@mail.gmail.com> <2A965C32-BAF0-4532-B0A1-35823A3DBCFC@pfrc.org> <495768E0-B0D4-4DED-B273-45542A666178@arista.com> <20181003210159.GC17157@pfrc.org> <CANVvrcrsS7rVbC_w_SZOKHCvf_ydQU9FWicXvyhv25=vmHVmbw@mail.gmail.com> <47185E22-CA75-4D59-9D02-8F915F1A7DFB@cisco.com> <CANVvrcpR-7jMKqGigeYTvTNL34xOD0+duZco=g=DoSB47UbJjw@mail.gmail.com> <20181004191527.GE17157@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20181004191527.GE17157@pfrc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.26.166]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8F721989E1A03841BF5EA7158CEC3989@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.29, xch-aln-019.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/i1aktNuiDgSWU3OBjPZLq8bsbxU>
Subject: Re: [GROW] A question about RFC7854 stats report
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 22:48:33 -0000

Qing, 

I can also provide some input on the draft as there are ones we have been wanting to add as a correction to the existing types. 

Thanks,
Tim

On 10/4/18, 12:16 PM, "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

    Qing,
    
    On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:28:30AM -0700, Qing Yang wrote:
    > Points well taken... NLRIs will be an improvement in terminology over
    > prefixes, too?
    > 
    > And yes, type 8 as it is worded today, is the reason that I think one
    > cannot derive the number of prefixes rejected by inbound policy from type 7
    > and 8. So I definitely agree with you that an update to RFC7584 would be
    > helpful.
    
    A trivial Internet-Draft, at least once draft-scudder-grow-bmp-registries-change
    has gone through.  My suggestion is to gather a list of stats you might want
    and kick off the draft.
    
    -- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email