Re: [GROW] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4384 (4550)

[David Meyer <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Warren Turkal <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Was it proper to classify this at technical errata? I wasn't sure about
> that.
>

Seems reasonable. --dmm



>
> Thanks,
> wt
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:56 PM, David Meyer <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Definitely a good catch. --dmm
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:12 PM, RFC Errata System <
>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4384,
>>> "BGP Communities for Data Collection".
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4384&eid=4550
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Technical
>>> Reported by: Warren Turkal <[e-mail]>
>>>
>>> Section: 4.1
>>>
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>> The chart at the bottom of 4.1:
>>>
>>>       0                   1                   2                   3
>>>       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>>>      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>>      |      0x00     |      0x0008   |           0x2A7C              |
>>>      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>>      |      0x00     |      0x00     |           0x10F2              |
>>>      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>>
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>>       0                   1                   2                   3
>>>       0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>>>      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>>      |      0x00     |      0x08     |           0x2A7C              |
>>>      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>>      |      0x00     |      0x00     |           0x10F2              |
>>>      +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>>
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>> The second group has a hex value that looks like two octets:
>>> \\"0x0008\\". If I am interpreting the chart, extended community RFCs, and
>>> the extended community IANA registry correctly, the second group should be
>>> a single octet (i.e. \\"0x08\\").
>>>
>>> Also, the same error is in the Section 4.2 chart as well.
>>>
>>> Instructions:
>>> -------------
>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC4384 (draft-ietf-grow-collection-communities-06)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title               : BGP Communities for Data Collection
>>> Publication Date    : February 2006
>>> Author(s)           : D. Meyer
>>> Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
>>> Source              : Global Routing Operations
>>> Area                : Operations and Management
>>> Stream              : IETF
>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>>
>>>
>>
>