IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] [Errata Verified] RFC4632 (4194)

Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com> Sun, 19 July 2015 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D261B2BEB; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dwMezkYHjdQW; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x229.google.com (mail-yk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60CE41A897F; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykay190 with SMTP id y190so125553858yka.3; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7BaVGtM1nPwYx55+YZ97Uo9OLeZrjHsIhYApr/Q8GSg=; b=Nl7hfbYYjymoOXEr3O9tJ2PyYHSgMrrW1+7+hAzmuUBZM0+txodusSIEidiYLRN3Ru Ou7TZVlOiadoVirKCMQycqUz1qrnIgkONX7WMopSz73w52x0OKc9V1LS5G3S60bWjrt0 MIIUruS2yfSjvX9O9wI0GxsRL/+1uEtVuhNd52Y+akcFVHmnH7yie6S4cpLKCDhJ8eMM 5t14suoYI0yAzOn8Fbjap/BOu9YN5jmJWAYIlPQjW5XLhB8CYuOyMlrW4Y8nMhRv26zf C0RC8M4HE2ltMdFY984wmJq0Uzg0snJEQsw5QW48e63Ei2+77xbrQwrCG/9eqzpX7xEb 451A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.137.4 with SMTP id z4mr23637041ywf.145.1437335482717; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.13.228.196 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.13.228.196 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150719080848.128B8180205@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20150719080848.128B8180205@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 15:51:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaY=cXWf4dEg9JTPM7K1-xG8DrV3wO7N4smg_Gi+9bqa8w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c06c100dedddc051b3fbeed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/sqSSxC56t9ySWb_ydV0SyHaSL6Q>
Cc: vaf@cisco.com, dubisthasslich@gmail.com, grow@ietf.org, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tli@tropos.com
Subject: Re: [GROW] [Errata Verified] RFC4632 (4194)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 19:51:25 -0000

That does seem.like a proper Errata.
On Jul 19, 2015 10:32 AM, "RFC Errata System" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been verified for RFC4632,
> "Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment
> and Aggregation Plan".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4632&eid=4194
>
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Verified
> Type: Editorial
>
> Reported by: larry <dubisthasslich@gmail.com>
> Date Reported: 2014-12-04
> Verified by: Benoit Claise (IESG)
>
> Section: 5.3
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>  Systems that process route announcements must be able to verify that
>    information that they receive is acceptable according to policy
>    rules.  Implementations that filter route advertisements must allow
>    masks or prefix lengths in filter elements.  Thus, filter elements
>    that formerly were specified as
>
>       accept 172.16.0.0
>       accept 172.25.120.0.0
>       accept 172.31.0.0
>       deny 10.2.0.0
>       accept 10.0.0.0
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>  Systems that process route announcements must be able to verify that
>    information that they receive is acceptable according to policy
>    rules.  Implementations that filter route advertisements must allow
>    masks or prefix lengths in filter elements.  Thus, filter elements
>    that formerly were specified as
>
>       accept 172.16.0.0
>       accept 172.25.120.0
>       accept 172.31.0.0
>       deny 10.2.0.0
>       accept 10.0.0.0
>
> Notes
> -----
> the second network address has 40 bits (5 groups of numbers instead of
> 4-32 bits).
>
> 172.25.120.0.0
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4632 (draft-ietf-grow-rfc1519bis-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet
> Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan
> Publication Date    : August 2006
> Author(s)           : V. Fuller, T. Li
> Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
> Source              : Global Routing Operations
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email