IETF Logo Mail Archive

[hackathon] constrained-voucher Hackathon IETF111 efforts

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 11 June 2021 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541A93A0CB4; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 08:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vOJpaFC8wVuq; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 08:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B5473A0CAF; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 08:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0014938DE3; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 11:46:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HDsSla1l_6Lv; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 11:46:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6FE38DDF; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 11:46:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE38586F; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 11:46:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: anima@ietf.org
cc: hackathon@ietf.org
Reply-to: anima@ietf.org
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 11:46:00 -0400
Message-ID: <29710.1623426360@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hackathon/iIK4UfNpXI0QmQwyFQZxECGyNL8>
Subject: [hackathon] constrained-voucher Hackathon IETF111 efforts
X-BeenThere: hackathon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion regarding past, present, and future IETF hackathons." <hackathon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hackathon>, <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hackathon/>
List-Post: <mailto:hackathon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon>, <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:46:09 -0000

At the beginning of May, the participants in the Thursday BRSKI Design team
call expressed interest in doing some interop testing among implementations.

We will do this during the IETF111 Hackathon online.
We have been waiting to hear if there will be any kind of L2 VPN available,
as our discovery protocol runs over IPv6-LL addresses.  Having heard nothing
we are pessimistically planning to operate with VPN.

Some participants will have a Join proxy locally, and others will just be
hardcoding Internet URLs into their pledge.

We have created a document to capture all the planning into at:
   https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T8Rtfk1zia_p05_6eb_WQA2Mmid-eP1-cAgnwdpF9Xk/edit?usp=sharing

We plan to use gather.town to chat, which allows us to jump into 1:1
conversations easily.  We also plan to use the anima@jabber.ietf.org channel.

We have just posted draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher-11.txt on which
the work is expected to be based.

There are still a few issues open which are editorial, and a few which also
more RFC8995 errata (still being debated).

We'd like to suggest that the WG start a WGLC on July 9, ending on July 30.

We've asked for some reviews, and Russ Housley already provided one (the same
day!), which we have yet to act on.  Any feedback/clarification from the
interop would go in as WGLC comments.

If we get VPN, then we may be able to test
  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy/
as well, which is also ready for WGLC.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email