RE: [Hash] Charter discussion, round 1

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 22 June 2005 00:03 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dksi5-0006ND-Uz; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:03:17 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dksi4-0006N7-Hc for hash@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:03:16 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA28979 for <hash@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:03:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from above.proper.com ([208.184.76.39]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Dkt64-0003WN-KD for hash@ietf.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:28:05 -0400
Received: from [165.227.249.220] (dsl2-63-249-92-231.cruzio.com [63.249.92.231]) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5M0388K098218 for <hash@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:03:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06230939bede5ada9c9c@[165.227.249.220]>
In-Reply-To: <7A3E1242FA9989439AD1F9B2D71C287F042741AD@sottmxs05.entrust.com>
References: <7A3E1242FA9989439AD1F9B2D71C287F042741AD@sottmxs05.entrust.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 17:03:15 -0700
To: hash@ietf.org
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: RE: [Hash] Charter discussion, round 1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc:
X-BeenThere: hash@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: hash.lists.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hash>, <mailto:hash-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/hash>
List-Post: <mailto:hash@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hash-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hash>, <mailto:hash-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: hash-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: hash-bounces@lists.ietf.org

At 3:59 PM -0400 6/16/05, Robert Zuccherato wrote:
>If a similar approach was taken with DSA (which would have to be 
>changed anyway to use anything other than SHA-1) then much of the 
>justification for the definition of a truncated hash function would 
>disappear.

Do we have any information on whether or not the same truncation 
approach is being taken on DSA as ECDSA? That would have a fairly 
significant affect on our charter items. If it isn't being taken, 
finding out why would also be helpful.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

_______________________________________________
Hash mailing list
Hash@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hash