Re: [Hash] UMAC and HMAC

Jim:

These have very different requirements.  My preference is to focus on the 
one-way hash function for this charter.  If your intuition turns out to be 
correct, then the charter can be expanded.

Russ

At 03:17 AM 6/21/2005, Jim Schaad wrote:
>In the process of reviewing some other documents a question has occurred to
>me.  If we are looking at the different places where hash functions are used
>during phase 2 of the charter work, should we include a section in these
>documents deal with other methods of acheving these aims?  Thus should we,
>at least in a cursory fashion, deal with items such as HMAC and UMAC for
>message authentication problems?
>
>Jim

_______________________________________________
Hash mailing list
Hash@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hash