Re: [fmc] Minutes of today's Bar BoF

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Sun, 04 August 2013 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: fmc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fmc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023B521E80AC for <fmc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.104, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lIw+c4vbuddz for <fmc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC90721E80A9 for <fmc@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 10so1611270lbf.18 for <fmc@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gq1BxFCJm9CCeoZ47AkAjm+g1LwStV8ROjhEynl7mWk=; b=PxD34lIKFJhqEQnXlUr/bRqpoiJ//P4NOZ0trkT0j3tZTH29vweGTpWlx8vsJ7O7kc hWyRF5uOI0JX8OPfFzeeNmNvGuTLGfuA97c6Y1bmR9JYa7cD98QjBtPs4014LEAfn0nJ VKbLDbfHLZwpOhhqJ2bx47rNdv+/nKP60lkp43+Di++sr/Nlfl54T5Z453PN+ubadUu9 5Iho1vXLnDK/JxVudkt1dJ7VoCvh7a73zcNI3olmqyRH2RBk0pmSNsikmWZN8EQsm4gL RsH3M0r7UKpuU9yGP+9EHOGmBPZeCSlnC7Il78cwR0u7vhzhwap8Zlbde+SAkPpkynnl dEkQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.188.165 with SMTP id gb5mr7584742lbc.38.1375654622605; Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.98.227 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51FD1008.4060309@bogus.com>
References: <CAC8QAcf8KJLvndFdF2v+HNfC3Jktwp2bfTGT+qLDmO06M7bsBQ@mail.gmail.com> <51FD1008.4060309@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 17:17:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcdMbfhG+A8WG+QDWCb+pDLgzoHCteOA96LUpBPSBRdm4w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c36da21d34e804e3268db2"
Cc: "fmc@ietf.org" <fmc@ietf.org>, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
Subject: Re: [fmc] Minutes of today's Bar BoF
X-BeenThere: fmc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: Fixed Mobile Convergence <fmc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fmc>, <mailto:fmc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fmc>
List-Post: <mailto:fmc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fmc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fmc>, <mailto:fmc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 22:17:05 -0000

Hi Joel,

My comments inline:

Regards,

Behcet

On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:

> two things jump out at me...
>
> 1.
>
>     Residential gateway -- home network -- fixed network edge router
>     All of the hosts in home network connected to RG should be
>     controlled by mobile network
>     One policy system, apply to both mobile and fixed networks
>     How do we get QoS constraints, policy from the mobile network?
>
> A Diameter session is established by the edge router in fixed network with
the policy server in mobile network and Diameter QoS protocol (RFC 5866) is
used, details are described in 3GPP standards.

Imho in the general case it's no business of my provider's at all what
> equipment I attach to my home-network.
>
>
Yes but within the limits of your contract with your provider.
So there is QoS control in degrees that vary from provider to provider in
different countries.


> 2. andrew's presentation diverges rather far from the stated problem.
>
> appart from the question of trust, there's an intense amount of singling
> going on if you're sending identity packet for every connection setup.
>
> I should let Andrew to reply to this point.


>
> On 7/31/13 1:43 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > We had a very productive meeting today which was attended by 16 or so
> > people.
> >
> > Please find attached the minutes.
> > Our special thanks to Pete McCann for taking the notes in such an
> > amazing detail.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dirk & Behcet
>
>