Re: [Hipsec] New WG items based on our new charter

Miika Komu <miika.komu@hiit.fi> Thu, 10 July 2008 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <hipsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: hip-archive@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-hip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD333A6995; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A863A6995 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.450, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_65=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i5OyIK-mulPp for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from creon.otaverkko.fi (creon.otaverkko.fi [212.68.0.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E023A6964 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by creon.otaverkko.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C28921AF8B; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:00:26 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from creon.otaverkko.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (creon.otaverkko.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06107-03; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:00:20 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from argo.otaverkko.fi (argo.otaverkko.fi [212.68.0.2]) by creon.otaverkko.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BECE21AF5D; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:00:20 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [82.130.20.68] (hil4.kyla.fi [82.130.20.68]) by argo.otaverkko.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0465A25ED06; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:00:20 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4875CFB6.6070600@hiit.fi>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:00:38 +0300
From: Miika Komu <miika.komu@hiit.fi>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 罗万明 <luowanming@cnnic.cn>
References: <415678083.28004@cnnic.cn>
In-Reply-To: <415678083.28004@cnnic.cn>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at otaverkko.fi
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] New WG items based on our new charter
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: miika@iki.fi
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Sender: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org

罗万明 wrote:

Hi,

I am interested too. Seems like all of us are coming to to the IETF. 
Would it make sense to have two separate (unofficial) meetings for the 
two open topics? We could use www.doodle.ch for easy scheduling of the 
meetings.

> ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÔø¾­Ìáµ½:
>> From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>
>> Reply-To: 
>> To: 'Gonzalo Camarillo' <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>,
> 'HIP' <hipsec@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Hipsec] New WG items based on our new charter
>> Date:Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:11:17 +0800
>>
>>>>> o Specify a framework to build HIP-based overlays. This 
>>>> framework will 
>>>>> describe how HIP can perform some of the tasks needed to build an 
>>>>> overlay and how technologies developed somewhere else (e.g., a peer 
>>>>> protocol developed in the P2PSIP WG) can complement HIP by 
>>>> performing 
>>>>> the tasks HIP was not designed to perform.
>>>> We have the following individual submission:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-camarillo-hip-bone-01.txt
>>>>
>>>> Would people support this draft to become a WG item?
>> Yes, I support this draft.
>>
>>>>> o Specify how to carry certificates in the base exchange. This was 
>>>>> removed from the base HIP spec so that the mechanism is 
>>>> specified in a 
>>>>> stand-alone spec.
>>>> We have the following individual submission:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-varjonen-hip-cert-00.txt
>>>>
>>>> Would people support this draft to become a WG item?
>> Yes, I support this draft.
> 
> Yes, I also support this draft.
> 
> 
>>>>> o Specify how to carry upper-layer data over specified HIP packets.
>>>>> These include some of the existing HIP packets and possibly new HIP 
>>>>> packets (e.g., a HIP packet that occurs outside a HIP base 
>>>> exchange).
>>>> We still do not have any individual submission for this 
>>>> chartered item.
>> I am interested to work on this. If anybody else is interested too, we can team
> up
>> for it. 
> 
> 
> I would like to work on this issue. So, I think we can work together :-)
> 
> 
> If this work has already taken by somebody and close to finish, please let
>> me know too.
>>
>> Sheng JIANG, Ph.D.
>>
>> IP Research Department, Networking Research Department, Network Product Line,
> Huawei
>> Technologies Co. Ltd.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>
> 
> 
> Luo Wanming,Ph.D.
> ----------------------------------------
> China Internet Information Center,CNNIC
> ----------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec