[Hipsec-rg] discussion of draft-lee-hip-object-01

[miika.komu at hiit.fi (Miika Komu)]

Henderson, Thomas R wrote:

Hi,

I would be in favor of adding the document as an RG item although more 
work is needed as indicated by the meeting notes.

> All,
> In Minneapolis, we also discussed, at length, the Object-to-Object
> communications draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-hip-object-01
> 
> The authors are likewise asking the RG for feedback and for whether the
> RG would like to adopt this as a work item.
> 
> The discussion at the meeting is summarized in the meeting minutes:
> https://listserv.cybertrust.com/pipermail/hipsec-rg/2008-December/000538
> .html
> 
> To summarize the meeting discussion, several people expressed interest
> in the basic concept proposed, which is to generalize HIP to allow other
> objects (besides internet stacks) to be named, although there was some
> debate as to whether the draft proposes the right mechanisms for this.
> However, there were also a few comments that the use cases are not well
> defined, such that some people had trouble understanding exactly what is
> being proposed and why. 
> 
> Again, please provide feedback on the draft and on whether you think the
> RG should actively work this item.
> 
> - Tom
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec-rg mailing list
> Hipsec-rg at listserv.cybertrust.com
> https://listserv.cybertrust.com/mailman/listinfo/hipsec-rg