Re: [hiprg] host identifiers in Back to My Mac (BTMM) service

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Mon, 05 April 2010 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: hiprg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiprg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267B53A6A2D for <hiprg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WvNZkRQxl5vZ for <hiprg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919FF3A69DE for <hiprg@irtf.org>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 11:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id C76DF6BE597; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:20:32 -0400 (EDT)
To: hiprg@irtf.org
Message-Id: <20100405182032.C76DF6BE597@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:20:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:25:08 -0700
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [hiprg] host identifiers in Back to My Mac (BTMM) service
X-BeenThere: hiprg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Host Identity Protocol \(HIP\) Research Group" <hiprg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/hiprg>
List-Post: <mailto:hiprg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:20:52 -0000

    > From: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>

    > BTTM chose to use IPv6 ULAs instead of HITs as the host identifiers;
    > section 6.2 discusses the rationale.

Interesting - thanks for the pointer. I didn't quite understand this part:

  For HIP .. we still lack a secure way to retrieve the host ID.

but perhaps if I understood more about BTMM I'd understand why.

	Noel