IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] Minor correction to rfc7401 4.4.4 state machine

Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu> Mon, 29 June 2015 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1ABC1B33D6 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0uI5fQtT5E1U for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout25.s.uw.edu (mxout25.s.uw.edu [140.142.234.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DED881B33C4 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hymn03.u.washington.edu (hymn03.u.washington.edu [140.142.9.111]) by mxout25.s.uw.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW15.02) with ESMTP id t5TKKmZ8011607 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:20:49 -0700
Received: from hymn03.u.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn03.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with ESMTP id t5TKKjaT019725 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:20:45 -0700
Received: from localhost (Unknown UID 15833@localhost) by hymn03.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+Submit-local) with ESMTP id t5TKKitE019722 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:20:44 -0700
X-Auth-Received: from [73.181.150.17] by hymn03.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:20:44 PDT
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:20:44 -0700
From: Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1506291320440.12333@hymn03.u.washington.edu>
User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1903399159-2101333380-1435609244=:12333"
X-PMX-Version: 6.1.0.2415318, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.6.29.201216
X-PMX-Server: mxout25.s.uw.edu
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MP_MIXED 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_800_899 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, SMALL_BODY 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_MIXED 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HIGHBITS 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __USER_AGENT 0'
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/2mRrp4rmIunL0sm23xaesm3F-Hg>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Minor correction to rfc7401 4.4.4 state machine
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 20:23:31 -0000


On 06/28/2015 09:51 AM, Darren Lissimore wrote:> Hey all;
> 
> Read through 7401, got to section 4.4.4
> ​page 36.
> There's an error in the transition from I1-SENT to I2-SENT
> ​.​
> The draft has it as  recv R2, send I2 and
> ​it ​
> should be
> ​probably be ​
> recv R1, send I2
> ​as per Table 3 page 29   "recevie r1, process" trigger.
> 
> ​Darren Lissimore

Hi Darren, I agree that is an error; I don't know how it crept in there.

Gonzalo, should we follow an errata process for this?

- Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email