IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] RFC 4423bis and hip-dex

Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com> Mon, 14 November 2016 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <miika.komu@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3601296E4 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 05:20:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j2b10HD5R9zH for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 05:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44CBE1296DF for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 05:20:25 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-5b107980000009f7-52-5829ba185094
Received: from ESESSHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.33]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id DC.D8.02551.81AB9285; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:20:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [100.94.2.119] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:17:56 +0100
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
References: <d0a5a44c-bf5c-399b-90c1-e379b4b8f39b@ericsson.com> <05261b68-ce2d-f6cc-7ce9-807b64151a4f@ericsson.com> <66ff7348-c953-9f76-af59-68e1fbac56db@ericsson.com>
From: Miika Komu <miika.komu@ericsson.com>
Organization: Ericsson AB
Message-ID: <b77afa5b-f499-2735-bba6-1b76ca2cd346@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:17:55 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <66ff7348-c953-9f76-af59-68e1fbac56db@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms080903070605030306040606"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7oq7ELs0Ig7N/eC2mLprMbNGw7jOj A5PH7klN7B5LlvxkCmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MqYuoytYL1pRW9zcgPjWaMuRk4OCQETiSPL 57F2MXJxCAmsY5Tov/GFBcJZxShx8GUPK0iVsICKxKQbc8FsEQEziff/VjFBFK1mlHjxtIER JMEs4Cgx6f0jsCI2AS2JVXeuM4PY/AKSEhsadoPZvAL2Es+/N7OD2CwCqhKLt70Gi4sKREhs +jqHBaJGUOLkzCdgNqeAg8SyJ2vZQZYxC3QzSiw4/AHI4QDarCJx8VjwBEaBWUhaZiErmwV2 k5nEvM0PmSFsbYllC19D2dYSM34dZIOwFSWmdD+EqjeVeH30IyOEbSyxbN1ftgWMHKsYRYtT i4tz042M9VKLMpOLi/Pz9PJSSzYxAiPi4JbfujsYV792PMQowMGoxMP7oV4jQog1say4MvcQ owrQnEcbVl9glGLJy89LVRLhzV+nGSHEm5JYWZValB9fVJqTWnyIUZqDRUmc12zl/XAhgfTE ktTs1NSC1CKYLBMHp1QDYwT7n6ILrgVbXpbG1G2dL9u61drKMtN+TbZCu7/7h7fORi6rk8/8 8j33cK5NTdppxtBnz9NEjSbu4G78qn5xd0Ous1flE9d7i//8yFviHrZsg8Ce3JUFjrKW/+9s XPT/y6HO4FcbdwhushZhzi1bvu34veUrNNz7d3MfaJhs7Mmk8vdC53EzfyWW4oxEQy3mouJE AC3NN/yQAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/ELN6U6huyGGpcLDPukH_fM2QtHE>
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] RFC 4423bis and hip-dex
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:20:28 -0000

Hi,

version 15 of RFC4423bis now references DEX.

On 10/27/2016 02:07 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi Miika,
>
> the plan is to publish rfc4423bis last, after all other drafts in our
> charter (including HIP DEX) have been published. So, this would not have
> any influence in the planned queue.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On 27/10/2016 1:57 PM, Miika Komu wrote:
>> Hi Gonzalo,
>>
>> On 10/21/2016 10:28 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>> Bob, Miika,
>>>
>>> RFC 4423bis does not reference the hip-dex draft. Should it?
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-14
>>
>> we can add it if needed. The only problem is that we should push back
>> the 4423bis draft in the IETF queue since dex creates an additional
>> dependency.
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email