[Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-05.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 11 December 2013 02:17 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6F41AE2F6; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:17:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xGibWnu1ahXe; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:17:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E7F1AE08D; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:17:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.83.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20131211021716.15511.13638.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:17:16 -0800
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org
Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-05.txt
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 02:17:19 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers Version 2 (ORCHIDv2) Author(s) : Julien Laganier Francis Dupont Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-05.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2013-12-10 Abstract: This document specifies an updated Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers format that obsoletes RFC4843. These identifiers are intended to be used as endpoint identifiers at applications and Application Programming Interfaces (API) and not as identifiers for network location at the IP layer, i.e., locators. They are designed to appear as application layer entities and at the existing IPv6 APIs, but they should not appear in actual IPv6 headers. To make them more like regular IPv6 addresses, they are expected to be routable at an overlay level. Consequently, while they are considered non-routable addresses from the IPv6 layer point-of-view, all existing IPv6 applications are expected to be able to use them in a manner compatible with current IPv6 addresses. The Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers originally defined in RFC4843 lacked a mechanism for cryptographic algorithm agility. The updated ORCHID format specified in this document removes this limitation by encoding in the identifier itself an index to the suite of cryptographic algorithms in use. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-0… internet-drafts