Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis

Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@helsinki.fi> Wed, 01 July 2015 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <samu.varjonen@helsinki.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAF31ACE28 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 23:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d2cuqAmX3bBf for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 23:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi (smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi [128.214.173.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD191AD04E for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 23:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.14] (62-78-245-228.bb.dnainternet.fi [62.78.245.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-rs1.it.helsinki.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t616EqhL000513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 1 Jul 2015 09:14:53 +0300
Message-ID: <5593855C.4070002@helsinki.fi>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 09:14:52 +0300
From: Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@helsinki.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, hipsec@ietf.org
References: <5583BF80.8060304@ericsson.com> <55891588.80604@helsinki.fi> <559240CB.9050005@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <559240CB.9050005@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/Gu3nehbXNiAwObF5P6e5UIhIGog>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 06:15:00 -0000

Hi,

to my knowledge rfc6253-bis does not need changes to work with rfc7401. Review 
and comments would still be welcome.

-Samu

On 30/06/15 10:10, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi Samu,
>
> thanks for having revised RFC6253bis:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/
>
> Could you please let us know the current status of the draft now that it
> has been revised? That is, what needs to happen next and what is needed
> overall before the draft is ready for WGLC.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On 23/06/2015 11:15 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> yes, we will update the document as soon as possible.
>>
>> BR,
>> Samu Varjonen
>>
>> On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>> Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis,
>>>
>>> the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis:
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01
>>>
>>> RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that
>>> it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a
>>> normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the
>>> publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis,
>>> and RFC5205bis).
>>>
>>> Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on
>>> your plans to revise this document?
>>>
>>> Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated
>>> reference?
>>>
>>>     draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>
>>