Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-03.txt
Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 13 December 2013 00:51 UTC
Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEAF1AE4D7 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:51:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dinLKnlSMV58 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x236.google.com (mail-ve0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FBF1AE154 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id jy13so905310veb.41 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:51:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MeaViVBLqrQlDCbO3r1q+NkUZJgCqOl3lQ/7/WpwLSk=; b=RbXetQCQwHacygocNzWg/mTc/sqCeF9U4vxXUF2GjvrAqpetjwgKdqM8LvFpc49LGt zPTeafx4buOsGcN3v3oLlRQcMtpno+nC2itKyV5mx3J6m/ORPuTdUShRDzf5wyTsrvsB mtcFsNQW8+uRjbcYUFmKnD9jZuMPX2EeCr38tvBSJ8+YCKZGpb8SO29Xv5gotgfHz5kO PXLVyponS6ORWy7mhYR/qrpjiCFwZXzCQ/UXp0oD54dQg7WuMTWeI4ZgkH6MqH0AGgkf XNa237wIeUkSxAjxTBFOqmr4yYZxF5n6omcZzEKKLultY2/Ky7u2h6Q6H0Pud/pixsub wqPg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.194.133 with SMTP id dy5mr5143291vcb.3.1386895868118; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.23.97 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:51:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52A891E5.6000207@cs.hut.fi>
References: <20131211043822.18392.39586.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52A891E5.6000207@cs.hut.fi>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:51:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CAE_dhjujO+M-aMv6Rfc=eNxxe=zvEP6W4+gwMLkBGTfG+OUO8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:51:16 -0000
OGA bits are included in the HIT that is itself part of the DNS HIP RR so I don't think they need to be captured. --julien On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi> wrote: > Hi, > > we discussed with Julien that we should update DNS extensions at least for > ECC. Should we also include also OGA bits in DNS? > > What else? > > > On 12/11/2013 06:38 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of >> the IETF. >> >> Title : Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System >> (DNS) Extension >> Author(s) : Julien Laganier >> Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-03.txt >> Pages : 16 >> Date : 2013-12-10 >> >> Abstract: >> This document specifies a new resource record (RR) for the Domain >> Name System (DNS), and how to use it with the Host Identity Protocol >> (HIP). This RR allows a HIP node to store in the DNS its Host >> Identity (HI, the public component of the node public-private key >> pair), Host Identity Tag (HIT, a truncated hash of its public key), >> and the Domain Names of its rendezvous servers (RVSs). This document >> obsoletes RFC5205. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-03 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-03 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> Hipsec@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >> >
- [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-0… internet-drafts
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-b… Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-b… Julien Laganier