[Hipsec] RETRACTION: Protocol Action: 'Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-19.txt)

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Thu, 25 September 2014 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9A71A014D; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yEOFQMsQcOlz; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677081A014E; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20140925160246.24684.36158.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:02:46 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/P-evg3P4w-BMd1iZ4BzZyeGjgbM
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, hip-chairs@tools.ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Hipsec] RETRACTION: Protocol Action: 'Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2)' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-19.txt)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:02:52 -0000

The IESG has requested retraction of this Protocol Action Announcement. 

The document state has been changed to "Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup."
Please remove this document from the RFC Editor Queue.

Best regards,
IESG Secretary

On Sep 24, 2014, at 1:29 PM, The IESG wrote:

> The IESG has approved the following document:
> - 'Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2)'
>  (draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-19.txt) as Proposed Standard
> This document is the product of the Host Identity Protocol Working 
> Group.
> The IESG contact persons are Ted Lemon and Brian Haberman.
> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis/
> Technical Summary:
>   This document specifies the details of the Host Identity Protocol
>   (HIP).  HIP allows consenting hosts to securely establish and
>   maintain shared IP-layer state, allowing separation of the
>   identifier and locator roles of IP addresses, thereby enabling
>   continuity of communications across IP address changes.  HIP is
>   based on a SIGMA- compliant Diffie-Hellman key exchange, using
>   public key identifiers from a new Host Identity namespace for
>   mutual peer authentication.  The protocol is designed to be
>   resistant to denial-of-service (DoS) and man-in-the-middle (MitM)
>   attacks.  When used together with another suitable security
>   protocol, such as the Encapsulated Security Payload (ESP), it
>   provides integrity protection and optional encryption for
>   upper-layer protocols, such as TCP and UDP.
>   This document obsoletes RFC 5201 and addresses the concerns raised
>   by the IESG, particularly that of crypto agility.  It also
>   incorporates lessons learned from the implementations of RFC 5201.
> Working Group Summary:
>  There is full consensus behind this document.
> Document Quality:
>  As discussed in RFC 6538, there are several implementations of the
>  Experimental HIP specs. At least HIP for Linux and OpenHIP will be
>  updated to comply with the standards-track specs.
> Personnel:
>  Gonzalo Camarillo is the document shepherd.
>  Ted Lemon is the responsible AD.