[Hipsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5202 (1798)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 29 June 2009 10:12 UTC
Return-Path: <web-usrn@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E111C3A68EF for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.215
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.215 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.384, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YV4zHfcnQEWm for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0613F3A6784 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TAC2O1020786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from web-usrn@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n5TABxh9020780; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:11:59 -0700
Message-Id: <200906291011.n5TABxh9020780@boreas.isi.edu>
To: petri.jokela@nomadiclab.com, rgm@icsalabs.com, pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com, rdroms@cisco.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, dward@cisco.com, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: web-usrn@boreas.isi.edu
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:16:32 -0700
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, ari.keranen@ericsson.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Hipsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5202 (1798)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:12:18 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5202, "Using the Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) Transport Format with the Host Identity Protocol (HIP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5202&eid=1798 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> Section: 5.1.2 Original Text ------------- Conversely, a recipient MUST be prepared to handle received transport parameters that contain more than six Suite IDs. Corrected Text -------------- Conversely, a recipient MUST be prepared to handle received transform parameters that contain more than six Suite IDs. Notes ----- The section describes the ESP "transform", not "transport", parameter. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5202 (draft-ietf-hip-esp-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Using the Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) Transport Format with the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Publication Date : April 2008 Author(s) : P. Jokela, R. Moskowitz, P. Nikander Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Host Identity Protocol Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Hipsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5202 (179… RFC Errata System