IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Hipsec] processing review comments on RFC 5201-bis

Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Mon, 30 June 2014 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23801A0452 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oESoyffJnpEg for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA7DD1A0300 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id at1so7416138iec.0 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8/G79cO+RceYT+l7bIb5eLIxT5bOFsO9Uvpc7U3mMqg=; b=YOVqM3nuSyWabt2/2FgXnbDc4zc++9ZXWDxT8gOL//a01wqFZ8tb+UUTpyvM8KGTMG cl5aBLjGmiQiVFTynK3TSpogWtL/lTh505cP5IOqJnRGwoMjMA7zJL6NwPaw4VkdUfKy l0xLCmnScER4I100iOJzeI+AiIBCJPF/3jBXEiESbgCC5zEXjdY8L4GMP2EAdcUenm4u oAjJnBroRt7Tl4A3+77jJeL8V2JhY7KhpaAtso80EUhYX8FgJFaO32p2ZmIRDyPXG5Gn 5XrU4qAwODb1Z7+ct+A0cUXyEuO5ZgFzGGDMa4p1qAOiMFrIZ7cbRtQGnzymePcyQwYr duSA==
X-Received: by 10.50.114.34 with SMTP id jd2mr35288554igb.35.1404161746328; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (dsl-173-206-0-110.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.0.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q11sm22233758igr.7.2014.06.30.13.55.45 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53B1CED0.40406@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:55:44 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org>, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
References: <201406301155.s5UBtAEc021262@givry.fdupont.fr> <53B1C46B.10307@tomh.org>
In-Reply-To: <53B1C46B.10307@tomh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/ZsZpPcAxO7qB-7DI4RJJYqsSsxA
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] processing review comments on RFC 5201-bis
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:55:48 -0000

Oops. I see I read 4843bis too quickly. the /23 is the source numbering 
space, out of which a single 28-bit prefix is to be allocated.

Tom Taylor

On 30/06/2014 4:11 PM, Tom Henderson wrote:
...
>
> While we are on this topic, Tom Taylor had suggested as an editorial
> comment:
>
> "Appendix E, opening sentence:  ORCHID prefix is now 23 bits, not 28 bits."
>
> but I believe that this is not correct (ORCHID prefix will eventually be
> 28 bits long out of the 2001::/23 space, if I am not mistaken).
>
> - Tom
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email