Re: [Hipsec] HIP and multicast
Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com> Wed, 16 December 2009 16:59 UTC
Return-Path: <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816DA3A690B for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:59:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Utl5PgsM7oar for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:59:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from n2.nomadiclab.com (n2.nomadiclab.com [IPv6:2001:14b8:400:101::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733D53A69C2 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:59:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by n2.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A0D1EF13D; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:59:08 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nomadiclab.com
Received: from n2.nomadiclab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inside.nomadiclab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OMkOULnnFIsM; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:59:07 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by n2.nomadiclab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCD01EF132; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:59:07 +0200 (EET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B28F986.6090508@htt-consult.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:59:07 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <30D81D3C-33A8-4B01-A9EF-39F95F590ECA@nomadiclab.com>
References: <4B28F986.6090508@htt-consult.com>
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] HIP and multicast
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:59:24 -0000
On 2009-12 -16, at 17:15 , Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Do we have anything to change on HIP and multicast in 4423: > > 9. Multicast > > There was little if any concrete thoughts about how HIP might affect > IP-layer or application-layer multicast. There's been one paper: http://www.hit.bme.hu/~jakab/edu/litr/Multicast/HIP_Multicast_HISM_infocom_kovacshazi.pdf I don't know of anything else. --Pekka
- [Hipsec] HIP and multicast Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] HIP and multicast Pekka Nikander