Re: [Hipsec] Status update on the four core drafts: 4423bis, 4843bis, 5201bis, and 5202bis

Hi Gonzalo,

Yes this version (i.e., draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-05.txt) is ready
for publication request.

Thanks,

--julien

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo
<Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes, I talked with Miika a dew days ago and I was under the impression
> that Julien was going to revise the draft once more before it was ready
> for be to take it.
>
> Julien, can you confirm *this* is the version you want me to pub req?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On 21/02/2014 12:10 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote:
>> Gonzalo,
>> Are there any other issues left to resolve on these drafts or can you make the publication request?  I believe that the open issues identified below have all been closed.
>>
>> - Tom
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: hipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 4:24 AM
>>> To: HIP
>>> Subject: [Hipsec] Status update on the four core drafts: 4423bis,
>>> 4843bis, 5201bis, and 5202bis
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> here you have a status update on the four core drafts. Note that at
>>> this point only one of them is ready for publication request. Authors
>>> and editors, please put some energy into this so that we can send them
>>> to our AD shortly.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/
>>>
>>> This draft needs to be revised. The last version expired in April:
>>>
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-05.txt
>>>
>>> We agreed that this draft will be Informational (the current version
>>> still says PS).
>>>
>>> Given the slow progress of this draft, we will not be blocking the
>>> other three drafts on this one. Nevertheless, we need to make some
>>> progress with this one as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis/
>>>
>>> This draft, which expires in a week, needs to be revised to fix a few
>>> nits. I am hoping that a new revision of this draft will be ready for
>>> publication request.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis/
>>>
>>> This revision seems to be ready for publication request. We will
>>> request the publication of the three drafts (4843bis, 5201bis, and
>>> 5202bis) together, though.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis/
>>>
>>> We need to add CMAC and GMAC to 5202-bis to provide a modern null
>>> cipher. We are waiting for text from Bob.
>>>
>>> Also, I still have not received a confirmation from all authors that
>>> they do not know any additional IPR on the draft. I hope to get it
>>> shortly.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec