[Hipsec] Fundamental ECC now an RFC
Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Tue, 08 February 2011 10:48 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C123A7081 for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 02:48:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iAFF3B+ISfPO for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 02:48:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023283A70DA for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 02:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D40E62A75 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:48:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NIBKpFPAfMtb for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 05:48:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (unknown [89.248.128.101]) (Authenticated sender: rgm@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62DBA62A2E for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 05:48:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4D511F73.10001@htt-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:48:19 +0100
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Hipsec] Fundamental ECC now an RFC
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:48:55 -0000
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6090.txt We will update 5201-bis accordingly. Meanwhile I would like to get some code size estimations for ECDSA and ECDH using RFC 6090. I have been asked this by sensor developers.
- [Hipsec] Fundamental ECC now an RFC Robert Moskowitz