Re: [Hipsec] References to expired work in progress in 4843bis and 5201bis

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Wed, 30 October 2013 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018B811E8109 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.590, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vJ8PsMwSYZG for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A915511E8135 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7eff8e000000eda-19-5270e350e719
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AE.14.03802.053E0725; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:45:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [131.160.126.146] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:45:36 +0100
Message-ID: <5270E350.2090506@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:45:36 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
References: <51DE5CA0.4010708@ericsson.com> <51E4F03C.2040000@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <51E4F03C.2040000@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrFJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW7A44Igg8t7bSymLprM7MDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujEfzDrEW9IhWzD2u2sDYINDFyMkhIWAi8fxWMzOELSZx4d56 ti5GLg4hgUOMEvdWn4Jy1jJKrHi6ggWkildAW2L181VMIDaLgKrE8qnXwWw2AQuJLbfug9WI CkRJbNh+AapeUOLkzCdgtoiApETP3aVgtrBAqMTmPS/ZQGwhAW+Jg5POsYLYnAI6Eq9XL2GE uEhSYsuLdnYQm1lAT2LK1RZGCFteYvvbOcwQvdoSy5+1sExgFJyFZN0sJC2zkLQsYGRexcie m5iZk15utIkRGH4Ht/xW3cF455zIIUZpDhYlcd4Pb52DhATSE0tSs1NTC1KL4otKc1KLDzEy cXBKNTCGdrE90Zz/lSNtr2W75Y1C0UuCL3zbbk0VOPrr7YxZF9Sy9u+ylc41UhB07LPL3Ohp V2K5S0+xQS7zftWbJ3pah5wvN2i/PbTs5qNFd00P97/jbvJILfyf99/g6kPmUO3I+J3eTdN8 Z0gemhNUeoHrVGLze+78XpWiow/bV23/zcEk3Gr+5bgSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgCaxUEpDQIAAA==
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] References to expired work in progress in 4843bis and 5201bis
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:45:54 -0000

Authors of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis,

could you please fix the nits below? Also, note that the current draft
will expire in a week.

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 16/07/2013 10:03 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> ID nits complains about the following in 4843bis. These nits need to be
> fixed before we request the publication of the draft:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-04.txt
> 
>   == Unused Reference: 'Hi3' is defined on line 433, but no explicit
>      reference was found in the text
> 
>   == Unused Reference: 'NodeID' is defined on line 443, but no explicit
>      reference was found in the text
> 
>   -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4773
>      (Obsoleted by RFC 6890)
> 
> ID nits also complains about 5201bis. Could the authors please have a
> look at this output and fix whatever needs to be fixed?
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-12.txt
> 
> And the same for 5202bis:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis-03.txt
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/07/2013 10:20 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as you know, we are preparing the publication request for 4843bis,
>> 5201bis, and 5202bis. The two former drafts have references to work in
>> progress that has expired years ago. Do we want to keep those references
>> in the drafts (see below)?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-04#section-9
>>
>> [PRIVACYTEXT]               Dupont, F., "A Simple Privacy Extension
>>                              for Mobile IPv6", Work in Progress,
>>                              July 2006.
>>
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dupont-mip6-privacyext-04
>>
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-12#section-12
>>
>>    [I-D.ietf-btns-c-api]       Richardson, M., Williams, N., Komu, M.,
>>                                and S. Tarkoma, "C-Bindings for IPsec
>>                                Application Programming Interfaces",
>>                                draft-ietf-btns-c-api-04 (work in
>>                                progress), March 2009.
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-btns-c-api-04
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
> 
>