Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-04.txt

Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 07 May 2013 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB1621F92EC for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.308
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c4hsmhlefHWE for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-x231.google.com (mail-vb0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D39711E80AD for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id q12so1006959vbe.36 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 May 2013 15:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=glKq2vp2bjWRgTqU1521L4SDv23HWsOBcP+ZYlnHHWg=; b=hU4MjXJNrgF7LO8U8Q53luNejQCWb56nAU3RpCKTcrdyzHgLctnN1ewTW9WHcEzU/K CB9NpsdTb6/qooULmfkyKSyF7MB/OElsBpIp3oPkmMNf2f/+84E8G3Gt2vocacdHoYnz ZSkYIICuVkz5st4i3iJ32/vTzsHjxWTKqouPEn7ZrlHime1AnTDTT9QG8PjHx4uCXQAe KjaGY8MPnvqsdMw4Slw58+9L47BXgA5EipMZWcwksEyBfZK4AW5dD/Qh3z0DDYyTJzRb Rj8s2sdbnUf9IhB9khXlkOk4Sv6r20MlEMbTPu3peQ5Mc2pyrMoQOmtvCT4YXN84NAyh /pNg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.26.228 with SMTP id o4mr2258173vdg.73.1367964625650; Tue, 07 May 2013 15:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.232.199 with HTTP; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130506172011.3987.22483.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20130506172011.3987.22483.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 15:10:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE_dhjs_vvifSHjWaJO=78spr6XU8iHZO6mAsjUkmYoyzKAnDw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 22:10:31 -0000

Hi,

I believe I have addresses all the WGLC comments so the document
should be ready to go to IESG together with 5201bis and 5202bis.

--julien

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:20 AM,  <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers Version 2 (ORCHIDv2)
>         Author(s)       : Julien Laganier
>                           Francis Dupont
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-04.txt
>         Pages           : 12
>         Date            : 2013-05-06
>
> Abstract:
>    This document specifies an updated Overlay Routable Cryptographic
>    Hash Identifiers format that obsoletes the earlier format defined in
>    [RFC4843].  These identifiers are intended to be used as endpoint
>    identifiers at applications and Application Programming Interfaces
>    (API) and not as identifiers for network location at the IP layer,
>    i.e., locators.  They are designed to appear as application layer
>    entities and at the existing IPv6 APIs, but they should not appear in
>    actual IPv6 headers.  To make them more like regular IPv6 addresses,
>    they are expected to be routable at an overlay level.  Consequently,
>    while they are considered non-routable addresses from the IPv6 layer
>    point-of-view, all existing IPv6 applications are expected to be able
>    to use them in a manner compatible with current IPv6 addresses.
>
>    The Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers originally
>    defined in [RFC4843] lacked a mechanism for cryptographic algorithm
>    agility.  The updated ORCHID format specified in this document
>    removes this limitation by encoding in the identifier itself an index
>    to the suite of cryptographic algorithms in use.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-04
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-04
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec