[Hipsec] draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01.txt

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Fri, 25 June 2010 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960833A698E for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.101, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GU7U28lK6T2W for <hipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com (klovia.htt-consult.com [208.83.67.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10D43A6926 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040E868B9A for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:52:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from klovia.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (klovia.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9dfqdZjIs43n for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:52:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nc2400.htt-consult.com (h155.home.htt [208.83.67.155]) (Authenticated sender: rgm@htt-consult.com) by klovia.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10C5B68B7B for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:52:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C2518F3.2070706@htt-consult.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:00:35 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Hipsec] draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01.txt
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:00:40 -0000

I am considering speaking out about a process to move Experimental 
protocols to Standards.

My thoughts is that RFC 2026 makes no statement to an Experiment 
completeing successfully and then moving to Standards.

Any thoughts?

Or just leave well enough alone....