[HOKEY] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5296 (1845)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 31 August 2009 19:30 UTC
Return-Path: <web-usrn@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: hokey@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F15528C359 for <hokey@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.778
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.778 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.821, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I4u2XsztQndj for <hokey@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A2E3A6EC5 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7VJSEhE020848; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from web-usrn@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n7VJSDhO020847; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:28:13 -0700
Message-Id: <200908311928.n7VJSDhO020847@boreas.isi.edu>
To: vidyan@qualcomm.com, ldondeti@qualcomm.com, tim.polk@nist.gov, pasi.eronen@nokia.com, gwz@net-zen.net, tena@huawei.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: web-usrn@boreas.isi.edu
Cc: hokey@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [HOKEY] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5296 (1845)
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:30:08 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5296, "EAP Extensions for EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5296&eid=1845 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net> Section: 2 Original Text ------------- An ER server is a logical entity; the home ER server is located on the same backend authentication server as the EAP server in the home domain. The local ER server may not necessarily be a full EAP server. Corrected Text -------------- An ER server is a logical entity; it may not necessarily be co-located with, or physically part of, a full EAP server. Notes ----- The original text makes two unwarranted assumptions, which the corrected text eliminates. The first assumption is that the EAP server in the home domain is located on a back-end authentication (i.e., AAA) server; the second that the home ERP server is also located there. Neither of these conditions are required and place unnecessary restrictions upon deployment options. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5296 (draft-ietf-hokey-erx-14) -------------------------------------- Title : EAP Extensions for EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP) Publication Date : August 2008 Author(s) : V. Narayanan, L. Dondeti Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Handover Keying Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [HOKEY] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5296 (1845) RFC Errata System