Re: [HOKEY] Last Call: draft-ietf-hokey-reauth-ps

Charles Clancy <clancy@cs.umd.edu> Tue, 19 February 2008 04:00 UTC

Return-Path: <hokey-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-hokey-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-hokey-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7BB3A6826; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:00:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NdrlLT8P+RTy; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:00:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C219728C323; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:00:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: hokey@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190B53A6826 for <hokey@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:00:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GLi+MHwJ5Bk for <hokey@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:00:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bacon.cs.umd.edu (server-nat-2.cs.umd.edu [128.8.127.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C7C28C356 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pool-71-179-91-146.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [71.179.91.146]) (authenticated bits=0) by bacon.cs.umd.edu (8.13.1/8.12.5) with ESMTP id m1J40GAQ024884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:00:17 -0500
Message-ID: <47BA5449.5040904@cs.umd.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:00:09 -0500
From: Charles Clancy <clancy@cs.umd.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Glen Zorn <gzorn@arubanetworks.com>
References: <479F4056.2070000@deployingradius.com> <47AF73F5.40306@cs.umd.edu> <47AFFD2A.5030209@deployingradius.com> <A3DA4C2546E1614D8ACC896746CDCF29B94624@aruba-mx1.arubanetworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <A3DA4C2546E1614D8ACC896746CDCF29B94624@aruba-mx1.arubanetworks.com>
X-CSD-MailScanner-Information: Please email staff@cs.umd.edu for more information
X-CSD-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-CSD-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.323, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.08, BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-CSD-MailScanner-From: clancy@cs.umd.edu
Cc: hokey@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] Last Call: draft-ietf-hokey-reauth-ps
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: hokey-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: hokey-bounces@ietf.org

Both will be included in -09.  Thanks.

-- 
t. charles clancy, ph.d.                 eng.umd.edu/~tcc
electrical & computer engineering, university of maryland

Glen Zorn wrote:
> Some comments on
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hokey-reauth-ps-08.txt:
> 
> Editorial:
> In section 1, change:
> In many common deployment scenario
> 
> to:
> In many common deployment scenarios
> 
> 
> In section 4, change:
>       network support fast re-authentication.
>    Cryptographic Agility:  Any re-authentication protocol MUST support
> 
> to:
>       network support fast re-authentication.
> 
>    Cryptographic Agility:  Any re-authentication protocol MUST support
> 
> 
> Section 5.6, last sentence says: "The relation of the identities used by
> the transport protocol and the identities used for keying also needs to
> be explored."  Do you mean "The relation between the identities used by
> the transport protocol and the identities used for keying also needs to
> be explored."?
> 
> There is an extra space between sections 5.6 and 6.
> 
> 
> In section 6.1, change:
> EAP-SIM [RFC4186] and EAP-AKA [RFC4187] supports fast 
> 
> to:
> EAP-SIM [RFC4186] and EAP-AKA [RFC4187] support fast 

_______________________________________________
HOKEY mailing list
HOKEY@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey