IETF Logo Mail Archive

[HOKEY] EMSKname in keyName-NAI

Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com> Wed, 20 February 2008 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <hokey-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-hokey-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-hokey-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF8128C1C5; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:12:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.427
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.427 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jfRHhLa12vP1; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:12:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06FD28C263; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:12:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: hokey@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9537628C1BF for <hokey@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:12:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Ml06xHtM97X for <hokey@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:12:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toshi17.tari.toshiba.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:418:1403:0:212:17ff:fe52:7811]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AD928C1FA for <hokey@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:12:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from steelhead.localdomain (tarij-98.tari.toshiba.com [172.30.24.201] (may be forged)) by toshi17.tari.toshiba.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m1KKCVva003196; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:12:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from yohba@tari.toshiba.com)
Received: from ohba by steelhead.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>) id 1JRvIu-0004IO-Gi; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:12:32 -0500
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:12:32 -0500
From: Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>
To: hokey@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20080220201232.GH10906@steelhead.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
Subject: [HOKEY] EMSKname in keyName-NAI
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: hokey-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: hokey-bounces@ietf.org

I have two questions on EMSKname in keyName-NAI in draft-ietf-hokey-erx-11.txt:

"
  keyName-NAI - ERP messages are integrity protected with the rIK or
  the DS-rIK.  The use of rIK or DS-rIK for integrity protection of
  ERP messages is indicated by the EMSKname [3], the protocol, which
  is ERP, and the realm, which indicates the domainname of the ER
  server.  The EMSKname is copied into the username part of the NAI.
"

- What is the exact format of EMSKname ?  I could not fined an EMSK
name definition in [3].  

- Does the format of EMSKname (if specified somewhere) follow the NAI
format defined in RFC 4282?

Best Regards,
Yoshihiro Ohba
_______________________________________________
HOKEY mailing list
HOKEY@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email