Re: [HOKEY] New one-week WGLC limited to 5926bis IPR

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 21 February 2012 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCEF21F881D for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:23:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGs4Chu71F+C for <hokey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3693421F871D for <hokey@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A204F171CFD; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:22:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1329844978; bh=f47OV8pSS9ChqI 1d8mF80gi1rQ0+5JcTNQktbWW17OA=; b=XynzuwdJt5wmLkF2Fm1G8bc5+cb4Fs 3iOq/MS5gpSeQrMfPVMKSiG2biX8q4q4x5e1YqEzDlLXcwykr4qCEWO1kVJLRsLE 2yxIYLjXhnol/w0Y7n5wwty4zZlJBlHjVRb2l9vgIwn3kQQBZLC3KJ68ARzkO0Qp k6SKY5Df9k4wADF9SiMyY/Vk1tWdMBd3Wgbl9LxN7QA+qUlXDJmCXjnbQ17PnMIs B0m9dIipKZegAFkQOXTYyd4UH0x1kBKourhq2zLWuxkLl733KTi4XbgGlNGjW7TH OFRfRtAAfi6BQo2vMD6N2wOkTDq+f0tEfirY54gZu43+ZAcV89wKA/Wg==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id eQNjt6ldt6R5; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:22:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C95BE171C28; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:22:52 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4F43D2ED.8010003@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:22:53 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
References: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C2C4386@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C2C4386@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "hokey@ietf.org" <hokey@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] New one-week WGLC limited to 5926bis IPR
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:23:07 -0000

Hi,

Not about IPR as it happens, but caused by looking at that:-)

I just happened to be looking at this and I've only now
noticed that there is actually no reference for RFC5296
in the body of the document, which I guess isn't quite
right. (Yes, the meta-data is fine, and yes the
abstract says it, but without a reference.)

Sorry not to have spotted this before but I bet that
it'd generate a nit-picking discuss so maybe better
to head that off before we go there.

I'd suggest adding a sentence to end of the introduction
saying something like:

   This document updates RFC 5296. [RFC5296] The main
   changes are foo and bar.

Or maybe something like:

   This document contains a set of minor updates to
   RFC 5296 [RFC5296] based on implementation and
   deployment experience.

Or whatever is actually the case.

And then add the (informative) reference of course!

Cheers,
S.


On 02/18/2012 12:00 AM, Tina TSOU wrote:
> Dear all,
> This starts a new one-week WGLC limited to 5926bis IPR, which ends at Feb 25, 2012.
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis/
>
> The existing IPR declaration is for 5296.
> I've asked Microsoft, we've not heard back from Microsoft.
> We'll need to get this sorted before this gets approved.
>
> Best Regards,
> Glen&  Tina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOKEY mailing list
> HOKEY@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>