Re: [HOKEY] New one-week WGLC limited to 5926bis IPR

Hi,

Not about IPR as it happens, but caused by looking at that:-)

I just happened to be looking at this and I've only now
noticed that there is actually no reference for RFC5296
in the body of the document, which I guess isn't quite
right. (Yes, the meta-data is fine, and yes the
abstract says it, but without a reference.)

Sorry not to have spotted this before but I bet that
it'd generate a nit-picking discuss so maybe better
to head that off before we go there.

I'd suggest adding a sentence to end of the introduction
saying something like:

   This document updates RFC 5296. [RFC5296] The main
   changes are foo and bar.

Or maybe something like:

   This document contains a set of minor updates to
   RFC 5296 [RFC5296] based on implementation and
   deployment experience.

Or whatever is actually the case.

And then add the (informative) reference of course!

Cheers,
S.

On 02/18/2012 12:00 AM, Tina TSOU wrote:
> Dear all,
> This starts a new one-week WGLC limited to 5926bis IPR, which ends at Feb 25, 2012.
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis/
>
> The existing IPR declaration is for 5296.
> I've asked Microsoft, we've not heard back from Microsoft.
> We'll need to get this sorted before this gets approved.
>
> Best Regards,
> Glen&  Tina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HOKEY mailing list
> HOKEY@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
>