Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes
Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com> Tue, 26 February 2008 05:46 UTC
Return-Path: <hokey-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-hokey-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-hokey-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39C33A6969; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:46:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VaLD+JYwhAll; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:46:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D223A6B4A; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:46:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: hokey@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hokey@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BCC3A6969 for <hokey@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:46:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZB9Hu7SCM-S for <hokey@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toshi17.tari.toshiba.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:418:1403:0:212:17ff:fe52:7811]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04F828C0D7 for <hokey@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from steelhead.localdomain (toshi17.tari.toshiba.com [172.30.24.10]) by toshi17.tari.toshiba.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m1Q5k4jc031462; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:46:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from yohba@tari.toshiba.com)
Received: from ohba by steelhead.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>) id 1JTsaS-0001FJ-V1; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:42:44 -0500
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:42:42 -0500
From: Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>
To: Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <20080226054242.GB4494@steelhead.localdomain>
References: <A3DA4C2546E1614D8ACC896746CDCF29CEC757@aruba-mx1.arubanetworks.com> <47C32526.2080203@piuha.net> <47C32D86.2040204@qualcomm.com> <47C32FB2.2080800@piuha.net> <BLU137-W3364D33E2B6FB4AC6018B593180@phx.gbl> <47C33E13.5000404@qualcomm.com> <BLU137-W3014B1D52B1475CCBC1D2B93180@phx.gbl> <47C36BDC.6010909@qualcomm.com> <20080226032611.GD1759@steelhead.localdomain> <47C39651.6060708@qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47C39651.6060708@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, hokey@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes
X-BeenThere: hokey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: HOKEY WG Mailing List <hokey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/hokey>
List-Post: <mailto:hokey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey>, <mailto:hokey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: hokey-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: hokey-bounces@ietf.org
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:32:17PM -0800, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote: > On 2/25/2008 7:26 PM, Yoshihiro Ohba wrote: >> Roundtrips between EAP peer and EAP authenticator on the access link >> are not major part of signaling latency compared to AAA roundtrips. I >> have not heard a complaint on 802.11i 4-way handshake latency. > > Consider that not to be the case any more. I am complaining. :) More > seriously, handover latency of 10-20ms is a target in some networks. I have not heard of 10-20ms handover latency requirement. If we assume there is such a requirement, then none of ERX and EAP-KDE will satisfy the requirement because one AAA roundtrip can be even more than 20ms even with local AAA servers. Note that pre-authentication can eliminate such a post-handover AAA roundtrip. Yoshihiro Ohba > > If there is a sufficient budget for handover, we probably need to do > nothing for reauthentication. > > regards, > Lakshminath > >> >> Although it would be a nice thing to reduce any kind of roundtrips as >> much as possible, I am not sure, after reading the IETF Last Call >> comments, people outside the HOKEY WG seem to wonder if the expected >> benefit for more optimization with ERX pays to its deployment cost >> especially for existing lower-layers. This is my main motivation to >> come up with EAP-KDE method. >> >> Yoshihiro Ohba >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 05:31:08PM -0800, Lakshminath Dondeti wrote: >>> Hi Bernard, >>> >>> I have reviewed draft-ohba-eap-kde-01 before and it does not meet >>> fast reauthentication goals. Please see below: >>> >>> On 2/25/2008 3:24 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote: >>>> [BA] I've recently seen a draft (from Yoshi, submitted today) that seems >>>> to provide similar functionality with no changes to RFC 3748. Although >>>> I haven't reviewed the document in depth, it did seem to provide >>>> method-independent re-authentication without multiple round-trips >>>> (at least for case of a local ERX server, which is the most important >>>> one from a performance point of view). >>> The number of roundtrips on the access link is 3, if we take >>> connection open or an equivalent into account. With ERP, the peer >>> can start sending authenticated data after 1 RT. >>> >>>> This document will probably be discussed in IEEE 802, which could adopt >>>> it as their approach to EAP re-authentication going forward. >>> In other access technologies, the handover latency requirements are >>> more stringent and they have already adopted ERP and waiting for >>> publication of the ERP RFC. Without further optimizations, 802.11 >>> with 3 RTs or more for connection setup and EAP-KDE and 2 more for >>> the 4-way exchange has little to no hope of really achieving low >>> handover latency. >>> >>> That model does not fit for voice call continuity. >>> >>> regards, >>> Lakshminath >>> >>>> If possible, it would be good to have a single standard for this, as opposed >>>> to multiple competing ones. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HOKEY mailing list >>> HOKEY@ietf.org >>> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ HOKEY mailing list HOKEY@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hokey
- [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Jari Arkko
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Glen Zorn
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Glen Zorn
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Jari Arkko
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Glen Zorn
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Jari Arkko
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Jari Arkko
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Jari Arkko
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Jari Arkko
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Glen Zorn
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Glen Zorn
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Jari Arkko
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Jari Arkko
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Glen Zorn
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Sam Hartman
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Rafa Marin Lopez
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Rafa Marin Lopez
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Glen Zorn
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Yoshihiro Ohba
- [HOKEY] EAP-KDE [was Re: ERX-12 -- Please review … Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Bernard Aboba
- Re: [HOKEY] ERX-12 -- Please review changes Bernard Aboba