Re: [homegate] Proposed Charter Update - 2010/09/09

[Paul Hoffman <[e-mail]>]

OK, that all makes sense. I did not understand that the purpose of the many drafts on many topics was to help the rechartering effort. However, we still have some issues. The current proposal is:

>Goals and Milestones:
>---------------------
>
>Nov 2010 - Initial revision of a Home Network Architecture document
>Mar 2011 - Adopt a Home Network Architecture document as a WG item
>Mar 2011 - Individual drafts as WG candidates for Routed home requirements
>Mar 2011 - Individual drafts as WG candidates for Simple naming requirements
>Mar 2011 - Individual drafts as WG candidates for Multi-homing requirements
>Mar 2011 - Individual drafts as WG candidates for QoS requirements
>Mar 2011 - Individual drafts as WG candidates for Security requirements
>Mar 2011 - Individual drafts as WG candidates for DNSSEC requirements
>Jul 2011 - Recharter the working group
>Dec 2011 - Submission of the Home Network Architecture document to the IESG

Given what you said, I do not understand the first two and last line.

- Why would the WG not adopt the early version of the Home Network Architecture document?

- Why would the IESG want the WG to recharter when the WG still hasn't agreed on the contents of the Home Network Architecture document?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium