Re: [homenet] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-05

Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> Thu, 22 February 2018 10:30 UTC

Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9382312E8E6 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:30:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=toke.dk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Clg5CWR48yFg for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:30:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2001:470:dc45:1000::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBA7B12E896 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:30:35 -0800 (PST)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1519295433; bh=lGo0JkNPeIGLzHmPyz5AI/Jco7mOEp41UxUjpt70icA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=BIL59FCJtGsesU+27uyMl3aYyqR09G4m5BT5WFe/JHZuNkDnv5DBq0wikc3GGxKle 61cJYEfQSyg6Cnp5WgeUzYpEJi2LCsnk9f+Fjnr8BQeuuDkWf4ptQePoJvUFEx8nvu CK6aoFRhzHmSIlEUNBNN3XfQAVrQiao+GsHM+EYFZ5kMesNqLa9URJYzZ7ibNBkwTY B1kQ62ErMEKjWECXktPa4yznTCzA+qLq50PU9+tQtz7sJHAU+FRpqHXtyEFItbmKUi LK02gYnzHtgDceyvbRM0PmJz2oi243VftIPBSBDDIBeMvCMtxhPi+kA6SXY0g7+4RH SrZcYTP2X3Kog==
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>, "STARK\, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Cc: "homenet\@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <87zi41vpbn.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <151914881778.3979.5852568551524317238@ietfa.amsl.com> <87inarp40y.wl-jch@irif.fr> <e5f4cc8d-fa46-0b5b-519e-2f1300f2d5c4@gmail.com> <87371u6txx.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DD28688@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <87zi41vpbn.wl-jch@irif.fr>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:30:33 +0100
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87inap9v06.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/2PRdHrTmp2FIAwtWowuVmIJk94M>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-homenet-babel-profile-05
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:30:37 -0000

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> writes:

>>> This is not the notion that I tried to express, probably badly.  It's not
>>> necessarily the important feature, it's the one that will make people
>>> implement and deploy the protocol stack in the first place.
>
>> Suggestion for '"killer feature" of Homenet': driver for using Homenet
>
> That's good.
>
>>> If you find a sufficiently stately term that covers all of the above,
>>> I'll take it.  (My thesaurus suggests "chieftain", but I tend to favour
>>> "foreman".)
>
>> Suggestion for "our bosses": decision makers
>
> "easy to explain to the decision makers"?  It's okay, but sounds somewhat
> cold and corporate to my (admittedly foreign) ears.  I'll wait a little
> while in case somebody has a better idea.

"masters"
"liege lords"
"jarls"
"overseers"
"(robot) overlords"
"decision-making units"
"callers of shots"
"head honchos"


(As you can see, I tried and failed to come up with something better;
I'd tend to agree that "decision makers" is a bit cold and corporate,
but then we are writing a standards document, not a 19th century romance
novel...)

-Toke