IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] review of draft-ietf-homenet-redact and draft-ietf-homenet-dot

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3573129A92 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKubhjE0HZsx for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06C4012949E for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 1so230527747qkl.3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Jx0EdsVsY/PGuS4ffn3olE+DGjtsf48t8C720qjj+Ko=; b=wAZxFV6p0/yKHvfXxioBdbY0U3sq1Zvo9XZwdBwav4w2S7V0a05hj3TbkSvxjFk5rh rED1am+h76Yj3fYB5hisvpoUvR6RrPW+GRhuWrmNuP8g7621udFQH9Ydey8LvXrMBzwF YRR0rAwg6sOivP+xut75o+rMQz/UqQmSUw1fY0ap1ShMQ4ZL90/cASJv/fPeEehfiWCC iNyiaq2zlHWYo9EO155pEyhRNc7Wv/jBvPQqzbbCW4XIwVpyZ+r1hB//FIVuDRY9mQTh EMa7/trppL99OyprgzOU636aOM92jWneJCLdV6nnSzyYfM/9fuWw/Tw0zZDWRRBlmR57 js5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Jx0EdsVsY/PGuS4ffn3olE+DGjtsf48t8C720qjj+Ko=; b=LuHOgfCimglxY52S733fQWceXx+QwdIsIeXrWQ6+CIgnGmVieb4g2zXM8VwgDmlvga ZrTHdn5hpsvzFtZgURoEgWwhSYExAcZVigmXylHtOLQ6ODu9bcmL9YLY1eEmsNM2MKnB YdRi20UIlPJ6LbnTAyiH5jA/PREBqrXEVL1NF/MycLTN2bnGZrS8J/uRHM8ncuveVYpF yOpuRWum1zx5WeQra8ZC9/FXsfVdFzUIQp66tBueuoqNTVGIdU3ng3N93fXcMIN8SfiC cKfkTmisgAKzEorvPatRPp8sEwmdd/AEALzDTJgT8vdZ8Q8I8y5zhnlFgTSJ0G+V7t9S UzMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H21tg36C1vKA6zUKC0XGWcjGBzboysMtgofIijvXIBW4Q0uheaLr5EBMzAX7TOsXw==
X-Received: by 10.55.78.1 with SMTP id c1mr34611879qkb.251.1489432979177; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.20.202] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k62sm12833250qkd.21.2017.03.13.12.22.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <9448A617-124A-40C3-B5B1-ABA57F54E816@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0EA391A4-6E9A-41C5-AB58-0C4F88353E70"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:22:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <42ECD4C1-3A87-414C-91D3-8B709A8B3FB5@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
References: <42ECD4C1-3A87-414C-91D3-8B709A8B3FB5@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/A43dcx4PngGnCK5ZU1Rz6rchIHs>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] review of draft-ietf-homenet-redact and draft-ietf-homenet-dot
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:23:02 -0000

On Mar 12, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
> Seems fine. But on:
> 
>  RFC7788
>  did not follow the process defined in Special Use Domain
>  Names [1].
> 
> I would like to add that the issue is not just a process issue;
> the questions one would have to answer (like how other
> entities in the Internet should deal with the newly allocated
> name) went unanswered. Maybe:
> 
>  RFC7788
>  did not follow the process defined in Special Use Domain
>  Names [1], or specify how other software should deal with
>  the allocated name.

I just uploaded a new version of the doc with your proposed text.   Diff here:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-homenet-redact-03 <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-homenet-redact-03>

I also updated the homenet-dot document, and you should have received a link to the diff under a separate cover, and of course the announcement also went to the mailing list, where I'm sure it was completely buried in all today's other timely submissions.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email