Re: [homenet] 2nd Working Group Last Call for draft-homenet-arch

Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ipv6.occnc.com> Sat, 15 June 2013 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <curtis@ipv6.occnc.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF7621F9D38 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jdkziSHsko2S for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway1.orleans.occnc.com (unknown [173.9.106.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E580C21F9CDE for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harbor1.ipv6.occnc.com (harbor1.ipv6.occnc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1545::2:819]) (authenticated bits=0) by gateway1.orleans.occnc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5FIZ1De044175; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:35:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from curtis@ipv6.occnc.com)
Message-Id: <201306151835.r5FIZ1De044175@gateway1.orleans.occnc.com>
To: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ipv6.occnc.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:08:13 -0000." <53F00E5CD8B2E34C81C0C89EB0B4FE732DD9D252@wds-exc1.okna.nominet.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:35:01 -0400
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] 2nd Working Group Last Call for draft-homenet-arch
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: curtis@ipv6.occnc.com
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:36:25 -0000

In message <53F00E5CD8B2E34C81C0C89EB0B4FE732DD9D252@wds-exc1.okna.nominet.org.uk>
Ray Bellis writes:
 
> I'd like to remind the WG that this last call will expire *next Monday*.
>  
> Please send any comments to the list and editor ASAP.  It would also be useful to receive comments along the lines of "it's ready, ship it!".
>  
> thanks,
>  
> Ray


Hi Ray,

It is helpful if the draft name is spelled right in the WGLC.
draft-ietf-homenet-arch-08 but a search for homenet-arch is fine.

A lot of progress has been made in the last year or so.  Quite a few
issues remain open in that there is no solution recommended in
homenet-arch, or multiple solutions are recommended primarily because
downselection has not occurred.  Examples of the former is "routing
functionality" and service discovery beyond the subnet, and "domain
discovery".  Examples of the latter is address allocation, prefix
delegation.

BTW- Naming used to cite draft-mglt-homenet-naming-delegation and
draft-mglt-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation and I'm not sure why
those citations were dropped, unless they are now abandonned (they are
both expired).

The point is that though this framework has tremedously improved
(though it still cited mDNS and entertains the possibility of multiple
zeroconf name services plus DNS :), there is a ways to go.  Hopefully
this draft can remain a living document rather than freeze it
prematurely by moving it to the IESG and trying to get premature RFC
status.

On many issues the WG has converged in the last year or so, yet IMHO
too many remain open.

Curtis