Re: [homenet] ISIS wifi testing

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sat, 17 October 2015 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25861ACCF4 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dyXRrClt2GUQ for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA7301ACD00 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0588FA1; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:03:36 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1445076217; bh=2W8TeKKo3MNhsto34cdSn+nNWMn4HnajpQ86RWOdgf8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=O57g1usY2NagG1OlJuDl1XjbU2RlDZjk9sgNN+BY9IZxHRio8arKtDm60b0JpDIDn ly3FKWEIg74t6fHys0mBdbASA/kwo3asoYrLCduAE88gzybRvTyjYKI8wH4S9GLVba NoOL6SfcPnxRpsHA9Nbux3iphD1LYqY72fy00+W8=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBC19F; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:03:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:03:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Chris Elliott <chelliot@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO_Rpc+v0JD5Xrhv7=3AQFXqXK=0grt=rMAxD2fJF0U9Z=BY=A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510171201060.16053@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510161434010.16053@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAO_Rpc+v0JD5Xrhv7=3AQFXqXK=0grt=rMAxD2fJF0U9Z=BY=A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/N5EDfSQuKNBUwB26WWHHtjo0AXE>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] ISIS wifi testing
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 10:03:41 -0000

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Chris Elliott wrote:

> Mikael,
>
> Any chance you can repeat the tests using multi and broadcast traffic? May
> not be enough clients...

Yes, I can do both the "p2mp" and multicastcast modes, that's fairly easy 
to test.

However, as you say, I don't expect there to be much multicast loss 
because 2.4GHz isn't hugely congested where I live.

Now that I have a better feel for the setup and most of the bugs worked 
out (I hope), on monday I'll do quite a few more tests and I also intend 
to use babel and try a few similar test cases with it and compare.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se