Re: [homenet] Multilink subnet routing (MLSRv2)

Wes Beebee <wbeebee@cisco.com> Tue, 11 October 2011 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <wbeebee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D673A21F8D9A for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AFIx9tgN6vV1 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7B921F8C1F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=wbeebee@cisco.com; l=878; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1318340819; x=1319550419; h=date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x4CerZRh5+iEYsFnZyFiK0on7MT2LdGZKy1xz699Bio=; b=JiVCxuFA/LhbAOZ0rwzzGy+HSpy35lPmGQji029uyZxnofp3JIMjnMwW oWbt2YWrOLeGU9QmBquPgcy6ozoFnXaxXB9r6KyUjCfG0+YlIodB2y8Gx 6YnzJEdzKAMuuUPFfzs220o6lPdYTBNzJfB60/WMK9piz89B2H/+KQQNo U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,523,1312156800"; d="scan'208";a="27529033"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Oct 2011 13:46:58 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9BDkwM2018102; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:46:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-201.cisco.com ([72.163.62.208]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:46:58 -0500
Received: from 161.44.175.128 ([161.44.175.128]) by XMB-RCD-201.cisco.com ([72.163.62.208]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:46:57 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.31.0.110725
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:46:55 -0400
From: Wes Beebee <wbeebee@cisco.com>
To: curtis@occnc.com, Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <CAB9C10F.178E08%wbeebee@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [homenet] Multilink subnet routing (MLSRv2)
Thread-Index: AcyIHDz0HWmwLYQeYEGxNGoYBRjxyQ==
In-Reply-To: <201110102050.p9AKoDdP055011@gateway.ipv6.occnc.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2011 13:46:58.0107 (UTC) FILETIME=[3ECE48B0:01CC881C]
Cc: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@cisco.com>, homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] Multilink subnet routing (MLSRv2)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:46:59 -0000

> Having missed the meeting, anything more recent on MLSR than this:
> 
>   draft-ietf-ipv6-multilink-subnets-00
>   Multi-link Subnet Support in IPv6 (2002-07-08, Expired)
> 
>   draft-thaler-ipngwg-multilink-subnets-02
>   Multi-link Subnet Support in IPv6 (2001-11-29, Expired)
> 
> The only reference to MLSR in an RFC is in an IAB RFC, RFC4903:
> 
>    There was also a proposal to define multi-link subnets [MLSR] for
>    IPv6.  However, this notion was abandoned by the IPv6 WG due to the
>    issues discussed in this memo, and that proposal was replaced by a
>    different mechanism that preserves the notion that a subnet spans
>    only one link [RFC4389].

Note that there is a subset of the multi-link subnet problem that can be
solved using an "off-link" model as described in RFC 5942, and is currently
deployed in DOCSIS networks.

- Wes