IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] About Ted's naming architecture presentation and document

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669B512950D for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:18:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EdYpK6ipZP8k for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:18:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44D111295B8 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:18:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g23so222736901wme.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:18:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FoygzLZi/ROvfc4l2mTrYwoNA9RerrFzhU7i7ikiUMY=; b=l7KBvPY8onABdFST0X8BNVj2SvBT6LFYBZ2+dfQ0YnT9UefJIAERaKaorEcPkKrReW goFKWqqZctq2POg1IPYAcDU3PPLEx0OOpNkiZ5yLwczG68s4uylhNb1oUA1E3MgpiGVI lxoaVQ+McbYj8aPTdMH5gYsQIyN2D+yFWfWkilzhzi10+TmS1kFSiAq4jJSF6yYzC7q0 N1we/J5Vbc2N7BVh25T9h/xbsF57rW5selEY4mK+LcYXjqOTpwtjmPUldC2G5xC3x1kT JGA7P/Z55WztW8i6a0H3+Sju9qdpyqZYMkD7eFYSf5O5SxKivdJFiNThY/H/ZWi0DJyP 7vWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FoygzLZi/ROvfc4l2mTrYwoNA9RerrFzhU7i7ikiUMY=; b=GWHT6mG09eEw9a/Xbcy5Llz6Hyq8vrfcVtdAlat2EndGKZvk+5p5mpyPv4YprZSoT0 ZBVsriiRqThyCdIDsBw/W4VenApX0XBLg2h0e10Sd6ARvYPH6r84lL0hIAd9K9fziOuE HrDb8q8XsaKOT3SKkt1cYkF8y1RMownFfpKNPOMQF21qzRfSDOCCzwtIdwOzehGXcFej L1BX1JdkA3D6ZELCvv0c3lx1DX02odwR2OFZET3G25C4pPlzn0I61TtGFz0DcWIR9m0p euneN3qNOu28/ZBajgoIXvI99fG4ecEKDl4xTMqzkFTL2He+1Go1DDEmI5IFkZvABD8D Y8Tw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfdBT5K5b9UdaZsKg+iJFp+vfwjwOjs/UOUJ9wFaOuR4ilu3jDkFHa8csPCDpYRr60z67+9BOHlfl3CHQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.190.79 with SMTP id o76mr611595lff.56.1479284296805; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:18:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.43.210 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:17:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87lgwj504t.wl-jch@irif.fr>
References: <871syc54d1.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1=eXRBh6UqGGqUSK9cH_jY5MvPcE4MFZUPe2Z48LF7bkA@mail.gmail.com> <87lgwj504t.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:17:36 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kDCMDBEpt7QYhHtPYjaMJAzw8G81=2y2f=y0ZProeCPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/TGKyvwfNWVic8ehEu7YYZck4uI0>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] About Ted's naming architecture presentation and document
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:18:20 -0000

I think publishing your lightbulb in the global DNS is generally out
of scope.   The plan is to define an architecture that is
upwards-compatible with the fancy all-singing all-dancing management
API/DNS zones model.   Yes, publishing stuff in the global DNS is out
of scope for the simple homenet naming architecture document.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> wrote:
>> The conclusion of the presentation today was that we should define a
>> model for DNSSD+mDNS hybrid that will scale up
>
> Thanks for the clarification, that wasn't clear to me -- there was a lot
> of discussion of management interfaces, smartphone apps, and stuff, and
> I wasn't fully awake yet.
>
> So publishing your lightbulb in the global DNS is out of scope for now?
>
> -- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email