Re: [homenet] Please review the No IPv4 draft

Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com> Fri, 18 April 2014 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC951A0194 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 19:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WNkirlVjLELN for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 19:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22d.google.com (mail-yk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705891A001E for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 19:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 10so1022668ykt.4 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 19:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=swxf5/iTchnu4+N/5R50GLgoEiDSQZ4wcUjzaSmSASM=; b=XjCKEAwlfxTaIIn0+I1gfXJf+dW2dkx3DCEaXpygMCvEn5frm/x7Vk8l+uDguV78/E gUI7ZfGPoE4pgBXis6j05UetP7qOLxdKXFpmVoVrSGmg1jN3ngdWoJMEZsSyLJJDFGWr iawamtxKZrUy7f5b12rk4SvnQFr9nccVaNDdOONfLD6P2ER4FX1wsmWj/VBsMMgcQf1m qV5CBFIL2TQKSaWhg0Q+KRVOmrPBQjV+LiZRtgPW8RbGbDp4DwiFa4gBttXlarSA7Yj3 qUJU2sVxSXVXqwoZlDtA1pw4TCdCjCGme6cOVz2RrfAf3pezDqpZYfo5/uJV9Lz6GJ6s L3qQ==
X-Received: by 10.236.177.100 with SMTP id c64mr27945319yhm.30.1397789181643; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 19:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.124.105] ([186.188.80.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e70sm51465155yhk.9.2014.04.17.19.46.19 for <homenet@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Apr 2014 19:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <535091FB.9010203@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 22:16:19 -0430
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: homenet@ietf.org
References: <534BF803.3090600@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <534BF803.3090600@viagenie.ca>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/Yuj6-Ae4fxr5RgCtirZTzh8zTsA
Subject: Re: [homenet] Please review the No IPv4 draft
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 02:46:27 -0000

Hi,
  Nice idea & draft.

  I like the idea of having the No-IPv4 option for DHCPv6. I don't like
the idea of having this option in a v4 world; mainly because in mix
networks where you might have some folks which only speak IPv4, imagine
a case where this option is sent by a DHCPv4 to a client who do not
understand v6. Of course, probably the client won't understand the
option and won't turn off IPv4. There is also the chance that this is a
modern OS but for some reason IPv6 was disable in the host, yes, it will
understand the option No-VP6 (sent by a dhcp4).
  Last but not least, following this thread some of you mentioned
filtering (RA, DHCP OFFER) in the switch can prevent some unwanted
situations.., there are also other networks that are switch-less.

Regards,

Alejandro Acosta,

El 4/14/2014 10:30 AM, Simon Perreault escribió:
> Dearest HOMENET,
> 
> We are soliciting reviews for this SUNSET4 draft:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sunset4-noipv4-00
> 
> In a nutshell, it defines DHCPv6 and RA options indicating to the host
> that IPv4 is not available. Since home networks are among those likely
> to see its use, reviews coming from HOMENET would be of tremendous help.
> 
> Thanks,
> Simon
>