Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home
"Edmon Chung" <edmon@registry.asia> Thu, 16 June 2016 23:58 UTC
Return-Path: <edmon@registry.asia>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161CD12DDD5 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=registry.asia
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ukgf1xGGR14j for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:58:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jerry.dot.asia (jerry.dot.asia [52.72.248.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D684A12DDD2 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaio11s (119246242132.ctinets.com [119.246.242.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by jerry.dot.asia (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u5GNwBeJ015749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:58:13 +0800
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 jerry.dot.asia u5GNwBeJ015749
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=registry.asia; s=default; t=1466121494; bh=2kgzkfgW5kYFDv8ZSPiUtoSZYWMEYVGSlHAUjuDOVSE=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:From; b=mZqlJ9q4GjHpKOQuFOdsqIF30DpcbnyTv1OrhakeNK6MHJaYqNkiJsmvvZux1Wd9b s9fGi0/f+TWSAYkNKZG+OQmdRQVpFGIZQayiGaADY03pW/Pz92afa5eeW7YiI+BK2e 6tAMXiVpnZgX95rsRqOvHVJYPd6IsY1hLWzfCcok=
From: Edmon Chung <edmon@registry.asia>
To: 'Juliusz Chroboczek' <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>, 'Michael Richardson' <mcr@sandelman.ca>
References: <76ed7404-35ff-9cc8-262b-d5785595465c@isc.org> <4598.1466104881@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <87porgafsq.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87porgafsq.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:58:10 +0800
Message-ID: <102a01d1c82a$f1e1e530$d5a5af90$@registry.asia>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQI3v8iVOYeq2J8k248AL7jKmU/wVwHEAREPAmhPsG6e/3CpsA==
Content-Language: en-hk
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/Z2o3tJ2GVraRAKruEfC1bV10jYo>
Cc: 'HOMENET' <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:58:18 -0000
perhaps it would be easier/better to pick a name from the "reserved names" at the ICANN/IANA which cannot otherwise be used anyway?... e.g. 2 character non-countrycodes: QM QN QO QP QQ QR QS QT QU QV QW QX QY QZ XA XB XC XD XE XF XG XH XI XJ XK XL XM XN XO XP XQ XR XS XT XU XV XW XX XY XZ The above are considered "User-assigned: free for assignment at the disposal of users" in the ISO3166 standard but are still reserved by ICANN/IANA not to be used anyway. Another option would be to add "-" or a digit to avoid collision, since those are also not currently accepted in ICANN TLDs. e.g. .H1 , .h-h Just some thoughts... rather than using an alphabetic "word" Edmon > -----Original Message----- > From: homenet [mailto:homenet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juliusz > Chroboczek > Sent: Friday, 17 June 2016 07:13 AM > To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> > Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home > > > Where THING is the local translation of "home". > > Let us please not open this particular can of worms: > > - how does software running on my laptop, which just connected to an > unknown network, find out what is the local translation of "home"? > > - how does a user, even one who knows the local language, find out which > of the possible translations of "home" is the right one? (What should > it be for Greek? oikos? opiti? You are allowed to consult speakers > of Greek, but you must get them to reach consensus before the end of > the week.) > > - how do I type οίκος on my French keyboard? > > There's some precedent for this kind of problems -- Outlook used to > (incorrectly) internationalise the prefix "Re:" in e-mail replies. Since software > couldn't be expected to know all of the Microsoftese for "Re", you'd end up with > subject lines such as "Re: Rép: Antw: Odp: ...". > (Re, of course, is Latin for "about such thing", not the abbreviation of > "reply".) > > (The right choice for Homenet, of course, is ".domus". Although, now that I think > about it, RFC 1034 doesn't mention whether domain names are in the nominative or > the locative, so perhaps we should also consider ".domo".) > > -- Juliusz > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > homenet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] RFC 7788-bis Peter Koch
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Erik Kline
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Jacques Latour
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home avri doria
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] RFC 7788-bis Ray Bellis
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Markus Stenberg
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Pierre Pfister
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Edmon Chung
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Edmon Chung
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Joe Touch
- Re: [homenet] RFC 7788-bis Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [homenet] RFC 7788-bis Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Joe Touch
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Edmon Chung
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Joe Touch
- [homenet] alternatives to .home Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] RFC 7788-bis Ray Bellis
- Re: [homenet] RFC 7788-bis Tim Wicinski
- Re: [homenet] RFC 7788-bis Ralph Droms
- [homenet] RFC 7788-bis Ray Bellis
- Re: [homenet] RFC 7788-bis (and also draft-cheshi… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] RFC 7788-bis (and also draft-cheshi… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] RFC 7788-bis (and also draft-cheshi… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Joe Touch
- Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home Ralph Droms