IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 17 June 2016 04:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F6512B02E for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 21:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PhMbkynkJo86 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 21:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8FCE12D1D3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 21:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f6so52942240lfg.0 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 21:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FkL5oje/ANGeBDMqMjetF4IrnBRLOf4xs5PPYiIZ/80=; b=V8G9QWYc3rTAaw94R9wgzIZWrQcoGngLL5r+yEY3WcjFFL8xMiyTWXQzgCAjC2oHe3 23mgtSRmVEc0kNDor3tF82VKF7JvqySIah1OSoYFYt6+4Er6G1tbRblCat4w6ua/uLyo EzY77wyK6u6RO2sLToHyUEYn6589Te/7fCLwfn6HXekzdem2UMJqzqbtIJSm/7u5H5eB /lxKsEK5asG+wKbq/nR2ZvvcosStcFCZRV7pDfYgyNtGsQmAqLTdWCKY/oSPYwbrWEhp Qo1ro++ez9rk/c0EV7sM4EX39pJpI7eu49YNp7yoP1T16bsoDDJ1B4pWUhOnsmrsUjKs cU/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FkL5oje/ANGeBDMqMjetF4IrnBRLOf4xs5PPYiIZ/80=; b=B3Jn+6A+X3Xyj6VQVbJO2Wbeho939Besj0im2d+u3UD5+xJFi2nKl217l32FeKBNm4 3WcUPbV/OnxGFVWUnomrjDWPGlH3SZ412PzgxTCgJOySP70ZnjjUCD+c00rHnWLLXPcF LDf3OIfVaqh7vD2k1JlguZoVKHoEmZPLwOnPWi9M1HZEEv48KhSL358sVwu7ZzIkooHV gw7NKzQphXi43+i0xE2IKEfFUPcIHHdGediQnykXfA+LGXk4O+uzD1Pttlvqwpbgeu9L JQCRoLKl3b1N3U5XvnYyAXBPwRKJhQf0n1NY89Wv0tbcHvGcKVg3Y/0qfeCVVzbU9lwp ENMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ+rKHR1GfcX4ylboQQ/isSOLXtc4Id07Y/M74xFHXSW7odgXfqOJCOUf7mu0ZIJKfg0JJtjXXt2bgHew==
X-Received: by 10.46.5.136 with SMTP id 130mr28667ljf.13.1466138590877; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 21:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.153.135 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 21:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160617011039.GC22195@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <76ed7404-35ff-9cc8-262b-d5785595465c@isc.org> <4598.1466104881@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <87porgafsq.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CAPt1N1=7XE0__mG9ckJc6hb0EGHK4QE93_+Eqi6Gg7Mf05cXdQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160617011039.GC22195@mx2.yitter.info>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:42:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1nXR7hOdiMyQspZ6vrbpzP2_bQJmx_pU-k9DNCNDOANQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a69b2e6aaae053571fdcc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/kkBgJlhbPRr-LMh8YmoeD5Gl4DI>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] alternatives to .home
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 04:43:15 -0000

Ordinary humans see names all the time.   See section 2.1 of the homenet
naming architecture; if you disagree with the reasoning there, please
suggest text!   :)

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lemon-homenet-naming-architecture-00#section-2.1

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 07:53:42PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
> >.local has worked
>
> But mostly because ordinary humans never see it.  That's what's not
> clear to me.
>
> Is this a name that will mostly be hidden by user-interface sugar
> (which is mostly how it works with mDNS -- please don't tell me about
> ssh.  That's not our audience, I maintain)?  If so, then any domain
> will do, and putting it under arpa would be fine.
>
> Is it a name that we expect people often to use in you-type-it-in
> contexts?  If so, then the story is very different.
>
> In any case, I'd really like "translation" to be off the table.  We
> are not competent to do that, and anyway we're specifying a permanent
> part of infrastructure that will not be able to evolve as (say)
> language evolves.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email